Hello TheNuggeteer, I saw that you nominated Piñon, Montrose County (probably soon to be retitled) for a Good article. I was wondering who gets credit for the good article if it passes? The reason I ask is that I did most of the work on it (77.4%) improving it and adding most of the content. Do you know how that works? Netherzone (talk) 13:29, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Netherzone: You could rightly claim it as a GA you significantly contributed to should it go through. If TheNuggeteer does much of the work replying to comments made in the GAN, then they would also be able to claim credit. GAs and FAs are perfect embodiments of the Wikipedia ideal that any achievement is a shared one! I hope that it goes through and you can both count on me if you need any help (even an article I'm still wary on deserves to be the best it can be!). ~ Pbritti (talk) 14:04, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, @Pbritti, you are very kind. GA's are a total mystery to me. Shortly after I created Pueblo pottery several years ago, a couple editors said it could easily be a GA. The process was not formally started, but I do remember that I got intimidated by the pre-GA questions/issues on Talk:Pueblo pottery and gave up. While I like creating and editing articles, I have zero confidence in my writing ability (I'm a very visually-oriented person and struggle with writing.) I have to say, tho, that WP has helped me become a better writer! Netherzone (talk) 15:03, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
GA is an award an article receives, rather than an individual. If someone contributed significantly to a GA (particularly if they wrote most of the prose present at promotion), then that person can claim that they've helped with that GA even if they done shepherd the article through the nomination process. Netherzone wrote more than 2/3 of the Piñon article prose, so they'd definitely be able to claim a share of the credit. It’s a good thing to share credit and doesn't diminish anyone's contributions. ~ Pbritti (talk) 11:41, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Greetings TheNuggeteer, we are both new to the GA process. However I have a few DYKs and shared credit on one DYK with another editor and it was a great experience! Wikipedia is a collaborative project.
I want to further explain the reason for my inquiry, in visual terms. Here is a link to some pie charts that show our contributions: [1]. Scroll down to the Authorship pie chart: Netherzone 82.9%, TheNuggeteer 9.8%. The "Top 10 by added text" pie chart shows: Netherzone 77.4%, TheNuggeteer 15%. (The difference is due to the fact I also added several historical photographs). To further illustrate here is a link to the article when you submitted it to AfC: [2] and here is what it looked like after the improvements I made: [3]. Does that help?
Thankfully Pbritti is experienced with GAs, so we have an expert to ask if we have questions about the GA process/procedure as it unfolds. As I (think) I understand, both you and I and any other interested editor can continue to improve the article as it moves through the GA review process towards quality improvement, but we cannot review it ourselves. Netherzone (talk) 15:30, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
My Draft page review is declined. Could you pls help for my Draft page edit. How to improve and edit my Draft because I need to publish my Draft. Pls kindly help me ..@TheNuggeteer
@Kyaw-Van Sorry for the late reply, but how do you know all of this information without citing any sources? Do you know him personally. Anyway, about the issues, I can't find any sources about him (except unreliable sources) making him not notable by the General Notability Guideline, If you can find any sources, (websites/pages about him), put the URL in your reply, I can cite the source on the article. TheNuggeteer (talk) 05:24, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I know him he is Youth Tech Entrepreneur in Myanmar.
