A tag has been placed on Carolyn Conant Van Blarcom requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
it is not relevant or important enough to have it's own Wikipedia page.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nominationbyvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. PennyGray (talk) 17:04, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Thirukannan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Palamedu. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Qualitist (talk) 09:39, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Thirukannan, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:45, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Surmukhi Raman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hariharan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
An article you recently created, Arunmozhi, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) In addition, there appears to be a WP:UPEorWP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 TT me 20:30, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Greetings.! Initially, I didnt know how to reply this message. I directly responded at the Talk page of the editor. After going through some of the previous discussions at the Teahouse, I learned that I should have responded at my page only. My interest in music and the position of fan of the subject of the article have influenced my editing of this page, and in fact, made me to focus on particular topics. I admit that I have showed a kind of value. I understand that both are against the neutrality policies of Wikipedia. I apologize for committing this mistake. Except these, I dont have any other conflict of interests in relation to my editing. I am thankful for this warning and remain grateful for any advice. I am trying to understand the basic policies and the core values of Wikipedia that govern the roles and behaviors of editors. I am also widening my focus areas of interests to learn and read more before editing any page. I will be more cautious in the future. I have revised the draft from a neutral point of view, and cited few more sources. I request you to comment on this. Thank you for the guidance.Thirukannan (talk) 06:40, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there, Thirukannan, and welcome to Women in Red. It's good to see you intend to help us improve our coverage of women. If you have not already done so, before you create your next biography you may find it useful to look through our Ten Simple Rules. You will no doubt be able to find women deserving articles in your areas of interest by looking through our Redlist index. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 10:50, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Seeing as you seem to be decently experienced I was wondering if requesting adoption is still necessary for you. SkyTheWolf (Talk) 15:01, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Your edit to Appiano Buonafede has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 21:57, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in discussions about infoboxes and to edits adding, deleting, collapsing, or removing verifiable information from infoboxes. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}}
on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
SN54129 16:53, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Further to Tim riley's comments:
The Manual of Style says: "Whether to include an infobox ... is determined through discussion and consensus among the editors at each individual article." While sports and politician bios can benefit from infoboxes, most articles in liberal arts fields do not. See arbitration report: "Infoboxes may be particularly unsuited to liberal arts fields when they repeat information already available in the lead section of the article, are misleading or oversimplify the topic for the reader". I disagree with including an infobox in most articles because: (1) The box would emphasize unimportant factoids stripped of context and lacking nuance, in competition with the WP:LEAD section, which emphasizes and contextualizes the most important facts. (2) Since the most important points in the article are already discussed in a good Lead section, or adequately discussed in the body of the article, the box would be redundant. (3) It would take up valuable space at the top of the article and hamper the layout and impact of the Lead. (4) Frequent errors creep into infoboxes, as updates are made to the articles but not reflected in the redundant info in the box, and they tend to draw vandalism, fancruft and repeated arguments among editors about what to include. (5) The boilerplate infobox templates create a block of code at the top of the edit screen that discourages new editors from editing the article. (6) It would discourage readers from reading the text of the article. (7) IBs distract editors from focusing on the content of the article. Instead of improving the article, they spend time working on this repetitive feature and its coding and formatting. See also WP:DISINFOBOX. All the best! -- Ssilvers (talk) 21:35, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Arunmozhi. Thanks! Noahfgodard (talk) 19:17, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, please stop mass-changing date formats; this is disruptive, so I have undone many of your most recent edits. Date formats should only be changed when an article has strong national ties to an *English*-speaking country (i.e. one where English is an official language); for example, Bernhard Romberg, one of the people whose articles you edited, is German so has no strong national ties in this case. Mass changes should be done by experienced editors who have thoroughly read the relevant guidelines. Your change to British date formats was completely inappropriate at the article about Maralin Niska, who was American. Also, in this edit, you said you were copy editing, but you used a hyphen rather than an en dash for a date range. Graham87 13:07, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Women in Red May 2022, Vol 8, Issue 5, Nos 214, 217, 227, 229, 230
|
--Innisfree987 (talk) 04:57, 2 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]
Hello, Thirukannan
Thank you for creating Annie Johnson Flint.
User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Nice work
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 (talk) 01:45, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Women in Red June 2022, Vol 8, Issue 6, Nos 214, 217, 227, 231, 232, 233
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 09:22, 31 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]
HiThirukannan! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.
|
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
DIVINE 16:34, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]Women in Red July 2022, Vol 8, Issue 7, Nos 214, 217, 234, 235
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:49, 27 June 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]
Hi Thirukannan! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at List of people from Guelph that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Kj cheetham (talk) 10:37, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Greetings.! Thank you so much for the guidance. It helps a lot, another learning experience indeed. Thanks & regards, Thirukannan (talk) 11:15, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Women in Red August 2022, Vol 8, Issue 8, Nos 214, 217, 236, 237, 238, 239
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 11:00, 29 July 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]
Women in Red September 2022, Vol 8, Issue 9, Nos 214, 217, 240, 241
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:38, 31 August 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]
Thanks for the checking out my bios. It's always nice to hear from you.
I would be happy to help you with your Wiki entries anytime. I am glad to see how hard you are working at this and I want to encourage you to keep at it. As you've seen, the process of writing and editing is not easy, especially in the face of criticism, but I'm happy to see that you are persisting. I enjoy it very much myself. One note of advice, check out the English rules for punctuation. For example, English writers don't put multiple symbols together, such as period and exclamation point, after the same phrase; we just use one or the other! That said, you do fine work and if I can help, please let me know. AMM Pittsburgh (talk) 15:23, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Greetings! Thank you so much for your valuable advice and encouraging words of appreciation. I want to make contructive contributions in Wikipedia. Also I feel happy in editing since it makes me to read more,and search for new information from reliable sources. However I face challenges in writings. Therefore I am grateful to all the editors for their guidance. Due to some personal case, I am not able to contribute for the last two months. Thank you for extending your help for my future edits. It is so kind of you. With thanks and regards, Thirukannan (talk) 09:17, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Women in Red October 2022, Vol 8, Issue 10, Nos 214, 217, 242, 243, 244
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:02, 29 September 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]
Hi there, Thirukannan. Just a word of thanks for all the biographies of women you've been creating. Great stuff! Keep up the good work!--Ipigott (talk) 08:43, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Thirukannan. Thank you for creating Carolyn Conant Van Blarcom. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thanks for creating the article!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 13:21, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Women in Red November 2022, Vol 8, Issue 11, Nos 214, 217, 245, 246, 247
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 17:36, 26 October 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]
Thank you for adding Short descriptions to articles. However, many of these descriptions have been much too long – the current guidelines at WP:SDSHORT advise a limit of around 40 characters. Please read the full guidelines at WP:SDCONTENT — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 15:06, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Greetings! Thank you so much for correcting me, and nicely shortening some of my edits. I will follow the limit of characters in the future. Thanks & regards, Thirukannan (talk) 17:09, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Thirukannan. Thank you for your work on Olena Kurylo. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thanks for creating the article!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 15:27, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Women in Red December 2022, Vol 8, Issue 12, Nos 214, 217, 248, 249, 250
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:57, 26 November 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Happy New Year from Women in Red | January 2023, Volume 9, Issue 1, Nos 250, 251, 252, 253, 254
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:04, 27 December 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]
Hi. I see you’re a member of the WikiProject Actors. I made a number of proposals to update the article about the actor Jamie Costa posted here Talk: Jamie Costa#Proposals for December 2022. I’m unable to do the edits since I have a personal connection to Costa. Could you possibly take a look at these edit suggestions? Thank you! EdwardPS19 (talk) 19:37, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for message. I am sorry I can't do it right now. I am not active for the past few days. I will be busy for couple of weeks more as well. Meanwhile, I think, hopefully the other editors may take a look at this article. Thank you for your contribution. Happy editing! Thirukannan (talk) 13:53, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Women in Red Feb 2023, Vol 9, Iss 2, Nos 251, 252, 255, 256, 257, 259
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:30, 30 January 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]
The Special Barnstar | |
Valborg Platou is an excellent page. Well done!! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 14:58, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply] |
Thank you so much. So kind of you. Thirukannan (talk) 01:12, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Women in Red Mar 2023, Vol 9, Iss 3, Nos 251, 252, 258, 259, 260, 261
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 12:55, 26 February 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]
Hello, Thirukannan. Thank you for your work on Nicole Chouraqui. User:MPGuy2824, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
please add the appropriate infobox
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
-MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:06, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Women in Red Apr 2023, Vol 9, Iss 4, Nos 251, 252, 262, 263, 264, 265, 266
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:53, 27 March 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]
The Original Barnstar | |
Wow. Elinor D. Gregg is another great article. Awesome work! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 16:08, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply] |
Women in Red May 2023, Vol 9, Iss 5, Nos 251, 252, 267, 268, 269, 270
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:30, 27 April 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
NP83 (talk) 10:30, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]The Original Barnstar | |
Great work on Marian Fleming Harwood!!!! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 16:12, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply] |
Women in Red June 2023, Vol 9, Iss 6, Nos 251, 252, 271, 272, 273
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 09:17, 28 May 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]
Women in Red June 2023, Vol 9, Iss 7, Nos 251, 252, 274, 275, 276
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:44, 27 June 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]
Women in Red 8th Anniversary | |
InJuly 2015 around 15.5% of the English Wikipedia's biographies were about women. As of July 2023, 19.61% of the English Wikipedia's biographies are about women. That's a lot of biographies created in the effort to close the gender gap. Happy 8th Anniversary! Join us for some virtual cake and add comments or memories and please keep on editing to close the gap! |
--Lajmmoore (talk) 11:02, 18 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]
Women in Red 8th Anniversary | |
A piece of cake for you! Thank you for participating. |
WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 15:23, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Women in Red August 2023, Vol 9, Iss 8, Nos 251, 252, 277, 278, 279, 280
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 19:26, 28 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]
Women in Red September 2023, Vol 9, Iss 9, Nos 251, 252, 281, 282, 283
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Victuallers (talk) 16:59, 25 August 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]
Women in Red October 2023, Vol 9, Iss 10, Nos 251, 252, 284, 285, 286
See also
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:54, 29 September 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]
Women in Red November 2023, Vol 9, Iss 11, Nos 251, 252, 287, 288, 289
See also Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 08:23, 26 October 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]
Your edit to Lucille Elizabeth Notter has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 20:24, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Women in Red December 2023, Vol 9, Iss 12, Nos 251, 252, 290, 291, 292
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:24, 27 November 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Women in Red | January 2024, Volume 10, Issue 1, Numbers 291, 293, 294, 295, 296
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:19, 28 December 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]
Hello, Thirukannan. Thank you for your work on Katherine Olmsted. Bastun, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Hi Thirukannan, very nice work on your new article! In my opinion, it would benefit from inclusion in additional appropriate Wikiprojects. It could possibly also benefit from another copy-editing pass, as I found some omitted words and some duplicated. Good job!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bastun}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 12:59, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Thirukannan. Thank you for your work on Ida Treat. Dcotos, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Hi, Thirukannan . as per references her full name is Ida Treat Bergeret. Thank you
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Dcotos}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Dcotos (talk) 12:27, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Women in Red | February 2024, Volume 10, Issue 2, Numbers 293, 294, 297, 298
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:11, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]
Women in Red | March 2024, Volume 10, Issue 3, Numbers 293, 294, 299, 300, 301
Announcements
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:24, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]
Hi there, Thirukannan, and thank you for a considerable number of women's biographies translated from other language versions of Wikipedia. While I see that you have added a translated tag on their talk pages, you have not correctly attributed the articles to the other language version, simply stating "new article" in your first edit comment. In order to avoid copyright problems, it is important to state your are basing your new article on a translation in your first edit comment in accordance with Help:Translation. To avoid further problems, you should edit all your translated articles adding something along the lines of "this articles contains a translation of the (whatever language) article (name of article). I have made an edit along these lines on Maria Szécsi. I hope you will be able to sort this out before someone accuses you of copy violation. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 14:22, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Women in Red | April 2024, Volume 10, Issue 4, Numbers 293, 294, 302, 303, 304
Announcements
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 19:44, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]
Women in Red | May 2024, Volume 10, Issue 5, Numbers 293, 294, 305, 306, 307
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 06:18, 28 April 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.
This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.
The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.
Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.
On behalf of the UCoC project team,
RamzyM (WMF) 23:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Women in Red | June 2024, Volume 10, Issue 6, Numbers 293, 294, 308, 309, 310
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 07:06, 23 May 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]
Women in Red | July 2024, Volume 10, Issue 7, Numbers 293, 294, 311, 312, 313
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 14:29, 30 June 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]