Contents

User talk:Tigerbindrawale

So, I removed your deletion tag on 1978 Sikh-Nirankari clashes, as this article doesn't meet the criteria for deletion, which would be, for instance, copyright infringement, defamation, or something else that was illegal; a lack of notability; or something else along those lines. Just because "It is a controversial article and facts are distorted on the page [in your opinion]" does not mean the article warrants deletion. You object that "The sources for article are independent opinionated websites and do not agree with the Delhi High Court ruling regarding Ranjit Singh." On Wikipedia, we rely on secondary sources. The High Court ruling would be a primary source. Also, just because the Court ruled a certain way doesn't mean it was correct. The idea on Wikipedia is to defer to what the secondary sources say, even if we object to what they say, or they contradict our political opinions, or they deviate from a primary source that we find to be more palatable. As a new editor, you might benefit from looking over WP:NUTSHELL, which sums up Wikipedia's basic policies and provides links that go into specific policies more in-depth, like WP:VERIFY and WP:NPOV. Best wishes, Tigercompanion25 (talk) 22:50, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Nakon 20:03, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

HiTigerbindrawale! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 15 May 2016 (UTC)