Contents

User talk:Travisharger

I have nominated Onething conference, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Onething conference. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. SuaveArt (talk) 02:49, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent uploads did not appear to be constructive and has been or soon will be deleted. Please read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Uploading images before you have optained rights to them is a serious violation of Wikipedia policy and may result in a permenant ban. Thank you. SuaveArt (talk) 02:56, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Write the article first. I saw no credible assertions of notability outside her own congregation. --Orange Mike | Talk 04:28, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have move the text of this article to User:Travisharger/Misty Edwards so that you may continue to work on it. If you have any questions please get in touch. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 16:56, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• thanks, it is much appreciated.Travisharger 17:14, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

As far as I'm concerned, feel free to move this article back to the main space as soon as you want. That way anyone can help make it better. In my opinion the deleting admin overstepped his bounds. If someone objects, tell them to take it up with me. DJ Clayworth (talk) 17:41, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

We could use it! Na'vi (talk) 23:01, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Travisharger —Preceding unsigned comment added by Na'vi (talk • contribs) 23:45, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also useful when reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Teapotgeorge^Talk 23:51, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• will do bro.

Thanks for actually doing the hard work of putting up inline citations in the IHOP article. It seems to me clear that the subject is notable, and I think the article is likely to pass the "Article for deletion" discussion, but a lot of the content you are adding is not itself notable, draws too heavily on promotional sources or is formatted in a way that is not appropriate for an encyclopedia project. For instance, the "random facts" section is inappropraite, and most of the lists (of ministries, of leaders, of controversies) could easily be condensed into short paragraphs. Would you be willing to hold off on making any further edits for a little while (a couple days maybe?) so that your fellow editors can "gut" the article? In Christ, JosiahHenderson (talk) 01:38, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have closed the discussion as pass. I also have cleaned up the article. Please do not try to reinsert the information which I have removed. The article needed a cleanup, so I have done so. If you are willing to discuss something going back in, please do so on the talk page of the article. Thanks and have a great day. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 02:23, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, I thought the Star was in there. Feel free to add it back in if it isn't. Just so you know, don't forget to sign your posts with ~~~~. Also, you might gain some more experience on citations by looking at other pages for their styles. Most of the bulk of the article was those citations, so please don't hesitate to look at other articles for inspiration. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 03:12, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I removed it without feeling (cold I know, but it's effective) so that I could clean up the article a bit easier. If I looked at every link, I would probably include all of them, so I figured a cold delete would be more effective than caring. I know that sounds odd, but it's extremely effective when cleaning articles. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 03:14, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You signed it, but since it's not linking to your talk page, it's not counting as being signed. This is odd, but try putting this under the signature thing in the preferences: [[User:Travisharger|Travis Harger]] ([[User_talk:Travisharger|talk]])

Just so you know, it is recommended that you link to you user and talk pages in your signature. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 17:53, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Travis, On edits you make to "talk pages" you "sign" by affixing 4 consecutive tildes (~) after your post. 200 words is a good "starting point". Annette46 (talk) 18:34, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Srry. BigHappyHarry (talk) 23:03, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't remember the edit but go ahead and put them back in and I'll look them over. Might have been a mistake.--SuaveArt (talk) 00:14, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

for housecleaning purposes, this page should be blanked or deleted, now that the article is recreated. someone could mistake your userpage for an article (not easy, but it can be done), and your sandbox article will slowly become more and more obsolete. Im glad you were able to find sources. oops, i just noticed you didnt do the recreation of the article. so your subpage differs substantially from the new article. well, if you have refs you can add that are valid sources, add them, then blank the page. (i know that sounds mean, but as you know the page will still exist in your history, just wont be searchable anymore) Mercurywoodrose (talk) 01:21, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Travisharger/Misty Edwards, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Travisharger/Misty Edwards and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Travisharger/Misty Edwards during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:18, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]