Hi, I noticed that you deleted the Sara Tavares page as G3 vandalism. I can understand that there was a lot of vandalism in the most recent versions of the article but there were previous versions which were ok so I cannot see how it meets the speedy criteria. Could you take another look and restore it, possibly keeping the vandals versions deleted? Thanks. Davewild (talk) 07:58, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for pointing the block cannon at Medusashield. tedder (talk) 01:43, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
how was that vandalism 76.252.77.225 (talk) 02:05, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Are you aware of this current discussion that started with a comment by Jimmy Wales, and got into the media? [1] and [2] As an anti-vandalism type, I thought you might be interested. I'm trying to suggest more sophisticated technical solutions might be more useful than an immediate community discussion, and I was hoping to see other anti-vandalism editors contributing to the discussion. Regards, Piano non troppo (talk) 03:49, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. I don't know how to PM you so I am doing this here. Sorry about that edit I made (about sea spiders). Not only was it lazy of me to edit the article rather than it's talk page but on closer inspection I was also incorrect. Now for something entirely different: you appear to be an admin. Could you explain to my why this page was deleted? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FIFE
It's for an open source, multi-language game engine that myself and many others are working on. It's years old and has a dedicated team designing the engine with 4 different game development teams based on it. You can learn more here: http://www.fifengine.de/module-pagesetter.phtml
Wikipedia is, of course, not an advertisement service, but I should certainly think this is notable enough to warrant a wikipedia article, especially if an elaborate, accurate one has already been written. Not notable? To who, somebody who doesn't know about it? This isn't Britanica. If an article is informative, accurate, and non-trivial, and gets a couple of thousand hits per year then deleting it makes no sense beyond satisfying somebody random admin's need to feel important - what is conserved exactly? Bandwidth? If people don't visit it much then it won't use much bandwidth in the first place, if people do visit it then it's exactly the sort of thing that should be on wikipedia! Iheartpython (talk) 04:48, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hi
Sorry to bother you about this, but you were the last reverter and as I am a little inexperienced I thought it best to contact you
The article has had several reverts, but I just came across it on a random article session. There is a line which doesn't sound quite right 1st line 1st para:-
"after the Central Kitsap High School student body became too large or fat."
Didn't want to get it wrong so please can you help ? Cheers--Chaosdruid (talk) 08:14, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Maria_Takagi&diff=266712562&oldid=266711876 why did you reverted the article? that's truth —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.82.182.7 (talk) 08:47, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
OK? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.82.182.7 (talk) 09:04, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Can you tell me, or put in my user subpace, what was here the two times before when this article was deleted? I'm curious, as I'm going to create Fashion Architecture Taste which is the name of the same architecture / art firm.
Also, thank you very much for your kind and generous assessment of my work and your suggestions. I'm planning to get back to you when I'm able to formulate an adequate response. ChildofMidnight (talk) 19:18, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I saw the spam and accompanying edit summary the spammer left on your userpage. These people make me mad. Just wanted to let you know I just reported his blogspot & wordpress blogs to their admins, and am looking to see if I can report his domains to some anti-spam organisation too. That'll probably cost him more than just 30 seconds to recreate. -- NathanoNL [ usr | msg | log ] 02:39, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my user page! mandarax • xɐɹɐpuɐɯ 04:05, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You see, I should have been more creative and username blocked rather than waiting for another spam attempt. The account was going nowhere - thanks for that! Pedro : Chat 08:58, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks to you too for your revert of my userpage
Razorflame has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. {{subst:if||| {{{message}}} ||subst=subst:}} To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!
Cheers, Razorflame 14:59, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
lol. man it's a good thing I wasn't eating anything or I'd be buying a new computer right now... Thanks for the laugh man. Thingg⊕⊗ 17:23, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I haven't followed the discussion in detail, but maybe you could habe a look at this [3]? The comment just above it seems inappropriate despite the author's denials (including on the other editor's talk page). I know feuding of this sort isn't pleasant, but I thought you might be willing to take a look. ChildofMidnight (talk) 19:43, 28 January 2009 (UTC) Actually I see some heavyweights are already part of that discussion, so I suppose there may not be any need for additional involvement. Anyway, it seemed a bad bit of business. ChildofMidnight (talk) 19:45, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Why are deleting my comments so it can not be disccused what I have said is true, its pronography and against wiki rules and the laws for it to be online where children can freely acces it!--Meiamme (talk) 03:33, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
"First off, there is no law dictating the exclusion of such material in the US" Really you claim its legal to supply it to children? (wiki is not an adults only site)
I suggest the gold start hall montior keeps to that and does not supply his worthless legal opinion! By your revert you just published x rated material in the USA and made it avaliable to children! Does that sound illegal to you?--Meiamme (talk) 03:41, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't make any of those changes, don't have any idea why they look like I made them. Strange. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.6.30.195 (talk) 03:42, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
They need pictures but have been locked down by religious zealots Apply your same logic please and get some real picture on there! --Meiamme (talk) 03:52, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
How can it be vandalism when I've taken the time to exactly translate the interview word by word and specified the exact timing and the source? I've worked pretty hard on improving this article to get a balanced tone and references and verifications for all info if you check the history page..83.226.168.214 (talk) 04:05, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for a prompt reply, yes I can agree about that, but those are her words - not mine - and the exact quote.. so I couldn't leave those out if it was to be precise and exact, which I think what we're striving for when it comes to quotes. Glad we sorted it out. Thanks again.83.226.168.214 (talk) 04:14, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Np. ;-) Take care. Over and out from Stockholm, Sweden. 83.226.168.214 (talk) 05:45, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Why is it not neutral to list Irgun here? Are you disputing that they were Jewish terrorists? Do you know what neutrality means? The article is biased, I was trying to add to it.93.96.148.42 (talk) 07:42, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
which one?93.96.148.42 (talk) 07:46, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Have done. I see a lot of pro-Israeli bias that won't compromise, and I know the pro-Palestinians can be crude. Would be great if you could put something nice on my talk page! must sleep 8.21am here!93.96.148.42 (talk) 08:21, 29 January 2009 (UTC) Thank you for the barn star! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.96.148.42 (talk) 08:28, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ceedjee (talk) 18:30, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This courtesy notice is being offered on your talk page as you have been active in music related discussions in the past. A discussion of a proposed wording change to "Criteria for musicians and ensembles" - Criteria 6 is underway on the Notability (music) talk page. Your feedback is appreciated. Thank you. Soundvisions1 (talk) 17:18, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for reverting those recent edits on the Martin Lindstedt article. While I have generally been keeping a very close eye on that page, the allegation (which has been made repeatedly) that I am somehow a follower of Martin Lindstedt is entirely false. On the contrary, I have had dealings with Martin online, and am thus very familiar with his views (which I don't share), and his legal case. While I don't agree with his political/theological worldview, I do believe he is being railroaded, and the fact is that the man was arrested almost four years age, and has yet to be formally charged with any criminal offense. Martin is an almost friendless (widely hated, in fact), penniless man in rural Missouri, and I don't want this article to be used as a platform by people who wish to unfairly paint him as a child molester. The fact is, I believe he will be vindicated of those allegations (which arose in connection with a child custody dispute, as is very characteristic of false allegations of child abuse), and like I said, despite being arrested for child molestation almost four years ago, no formal criminal complaint has been filed by the District Attorney's Office against him. Within that context, I think it is very wrong, both morally, and in terms of accuracy, for those people who despise Martin Lindstedt (and its fair to say he's gone out of his way to make many enemies over the years) to attempt to use his article as a platform for calling him a pedophile, when he was yet to even be charged with such an offense, let alone convicted of it. So thanks again, whatever your motive, for not letting some agenda-driven person pack that article with a lot of unpleasant statements about poor, beleagured Martin. Most people think he's a complete jerk, and I can understand that, but what the Hell? He may be a bit of a knucklehead, but I happen to like him in spite of all that. However offensive his views may be, no one has ever accused him of doing anything to hurt another human being (prior to this ludicrous farce stemming from the child custody dispute). So forgive my verbosity, and thanks again. KevinOKeeffe (talk) 11:49, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Just please clarify how my CluBot POST was vandalism. Thank You I am trying to bevery cooperative. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stingfan4lifendeath (talk • contribs) 03:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I was wondering exactly what i did wrong with adding links to Virtual Globetrotting on Leonard Riggio's page a little bit ago? could you help me figure it out?, thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tallybanner (talk • contribs) 04:26, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
My RFA passed today at 150/48/6. I wanted to thank you for weighing in, and I wanted to let you know I appreciated all of the comments, advice, criticism, and seriously took it all to heart this past week. I'll do my absolute best to not let any of you down with the incredible trust given me today. rootology (C)(T) 07:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply] | ![]() |
Thank you for the trust you placed in me by supporting my RfA (which passed and, apparently, I am now an admin!). I will do my best to continue to act in a way that is consistent with the policies of wikipedia as well with our common desire to build and perfect this repository of human knowledge; and can only hope that you never feel that your trust was misplaced. Thanks again! --Regent's Park (Rose Garden) 23:04, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Tru, since you offered..., would you mind checking what was at Tony Fretton before it was deleted? Much appreciated. ChildofMidnight (talk) 01:51, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Not much there:
Tony Fretton AA Dip RIBA ARB
Founded Tony Fretton Architects in 1982. After graduating from the Architectural Association School of Architecture he worked at Arup Associates. As well as being the Principal Designer of all projects, he is active in the discourse on design through lectures, seminars and writing.
Teaching posts include Unit Master at the Architectural Association, School in London from 1988-1992, Visiting Professor at the Berlage Institute Amsterdam and the Ecole Polytechnique Ferderale de Lausanne in 1994-96. Since 1999 he has been Professor of Architectural Design and Interiors at the TU Delft the Netherlands. He is currently teaching a semester at the Graduate School of Design, Harvard, Cambridge MA, USA (Spring 2005).
Did a little bit of digging on it too. Now I only looked for about ten minutes but I wasn't able to find enough to pass WP:N. Maybe you can find something I didn't. Trusilver 03:24, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Please, look at his contributions after I reported him, he is now posting the video on my talk page and saying he is imagining the girl as me. This does not need a warning, and is similiar to his violent statements on the other talk pages about how such murder should take place. --♥pashtun ismailiyya 08:12, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
NHRHS2010 (talk · contribs) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend, Go on smile! Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
NHRHS2010 | Talk to me 01:02, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hey NHRHS! Good to see you! Trusilver 01:04, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Not that it's a big deal, but is there a reason you're reporting vandals to AIV right before you block them yourself? Kuru talk 02:50, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, you detected 70.67.163.110 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) comment to me on my talk page as vandalism and reverted. No problem with that, though it wasn't really vandalism. What I was wondering about was if you could take a look at what he's doing on the Dan Henderson article, adding the nickname Decision, as in Decision Dan - a defamatory (am I using that word right?) nickname stemming from him often not finishing mixed martial arts bouts, taking them to a judges decision. He's added an unreliable source for it, and I'm not disputing people are calling him that (as seen with a google search), but it's not really appropriate here imo. Also, would this be a case where the BLP exception to WP:3RR applies, or is it (as I'm guessing) too "mild"? Thanks, --aktsu (t / c) 03:55, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
How else could you have reverted my edit less than a second after I made it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.213.120.190 (talk) 06:49, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The account 166.38.50.61 has been vandalizing again, check the history logs for Winn-Dixie: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Winn-Dixie&curid=543340&action=history What is the next step? You banned that account last time after warning and giving plenty of notice. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:166.38.50.61 --Sc0ttkclark (talk) 15:53, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Just thought I'd stop by and make a note (maybe you forgot), but there is no such user by the name of Blocking administrator (talk · contribs). When you use the
template, the text "blocking administrator" should be replaced with the username of the blocking administrator from the block log of the affected user. In the case of Soundout (talk · contribs), the blocking administrator is Orangemike (talk · contribs). The template should then look something like this: {{Unblock on hold|1=blocking administrator|2=original unblock reason|3=~~~~}}
. Anyway... I have fixed this for you already. --Lightsup55 ( T | C ) 19:09, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
{{Unblock on hold|1=Orangemike|2=original unblock reason|3=~~~~}}
...for removing those comments from my page. That guy has been stalking a bunch of editors under a number of sockpuppets, it's getting more than a bit disturbing. Paul 730 12:13, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, Trusliver. Quick revert there! Could you specify as to why my edits were "unconstructive"? Since I don't altogether have a hang of how everything on Wikipedia works, I'd appreciate it if you could respond here (or on the article talk page). Please revert if that was a bot edit. Thanks. 209.183.32.47 (talk) 06:01, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Great, Trusilver. I figured it would have been something like that. Thanks again. 209.183.32.47 (talk) 06:29, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I am new here and last week I added a link to the GAS GAS article for SMOG under the section Clubs & Organizations which SMOG is a club and you took it out. What did I do wrong? Is it not valuable for Owners of these bikes to know there is club that serves their needs? Also again as I am new would it be wrong to make a article for SMOG? Thanks for any guidance you can give me.Billh491 (talk) 19:47, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Like I said I am new. Well I looked over the page you sent me to and based on what I saw and how you read it there would never be any outside links allowed. I don't know why you banned my link maybe there is not enough new info on the SMOG page maybe you think the page is nothing but an ad to join the group. I just wanted to let people know the group was out there. As I said I put it in the Clubs & Organizations section. Well since you said you would ban my ip address if I posted it again I guess you are the final judge and jury on the subject. Thanks for making my first attempt at adding to Wikipedia an utter failure.Billh491 (talk) 04:17, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I do have an interest in Spanish dirt bikes and I only put links to the club for Spanish Motorcycle Owners Group on the pages of bikes that the club represent and as stated in the section Clubs & Organizations of the page. If I was putting spam links on every article I could find it would have been a lot more places. And if I was a spammer would I register with a name I use at other forums? In fact I would like to produce an article about SMOG will you allow me to do so? Billh491 (talk) 03:23, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I tried to get help on the admin noticeboard, but I'm just being ganged up on and attacked. Then I tried to report the person undoing my edits and vandalizing, but you and other people keep removing the report. I don't know what else to do! They won't leave me alone, and I can't edit because all that hard work is instantly reverted! Here is the problem:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Help_please.3F
Please help! UnitedRhapsody (talk) 06:03, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Most editors my foot! This is just a bunch of bullies ganging up on someone and trying to label them as a "sock", though I still have no idea what that's supposed to be. UnitedRhapsody (talk) 06:10, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
All you need to do is look at my contributions. All of my edits were good, then, out of nowhere, people are attacking me. I still don't get why. I'm stuck unable to edit until this matter is resolved, because they'll just revert my edits, no matter what they are. UnitedRhapsody (talk) 06:17, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
lets discuss about Barkha Dutt Articles but u cant delete vital info fm the articles when there is ref . lets discuss r u hav free time now.
opps sorry i forget to sign --HypocrisySlayer (talk) 06:50, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I turned this page into a redirect, but I see something was deleted there previously. If you don't mind fulfilling my curiosity you can let me know what was there. Otherwise no worries. I doubt it was much, but I always find it intersting to see what gets deleted instead of built up. ;) Not that I don't speedy my share of bits and pieces... Cheers. ChildofMidnight (talk) 06:29, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I've unprotected Paul Watson now that mediation has started. Obviously it can go back if the parties start warring rather than mediating. Cheers Kevin (talk) 07:10, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Now is this guy doing anything else but reverting ? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/TheRedPenOfDoom. Is this really justifyied? Happy Valentine's Day
Warrington (talk) 16:57, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, it was more like a general question. You can not source something which is not there. If someone goes and deletets everything added which has no sources or appear not to have than those parts can not be sourced any more.
And one more thing, why delete like this when one can try to find sources before deleting things?
Isn't it better to ask for a reference with a citation needen tag? like with this edit, for example: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Multiculturalism&diff=prev&oldid=270626186
Warrington (talk) 19:02, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for blocking him. I've spent a lot of time cleaning up his ever widening circle of destruction. This is a job that needed doing. 7&6=thirteen (talk) 02:15, 16 February 2009 (UTC) Stan[reply]
There once was a young man called Willy
He thought he was hotter than chilli
He moved all the pages
Admins got in rages
He's banned now - his page moves were silly.
He's banned because he was abusive-
ly socking, and that was conclusive
Checkuser confirmed
and I have now learned
That there's not much that rhymes with abusive!
A block is a technical measure
But to use it wisely we must never
Use cool down blocks
Even if they are cocks
We must stay calm whatever the weather!
The difference between these two odd things
Is that one prevents all second comings
It's issued with caution
A permanent abortion
From Wiki and all of its darlings.
A ban can be issued by Jimbo
the community or one of it's bimbos
a block is a technical
measure that's flexible
In that you're not gone - you're in limbo.
You ask, you get. I suck at this. — neuro(talk) 19:17, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
We are having a problem with a persistent vandal. Please help. Thanks. 7&6=thirteen (talk) 23:52, 16 February 2009 (UTC) Stan[reply]
Please monitor this user, who is currently exhibiting a pattern of vandalism. Thank you 7&6=thirteen (talk) 04:51, 17 February 2009 (UTC) Stan[reply]
Hey Trusilver, first off thanks for the adoption. I recently created a page about a local regional airport of mine, do you think it still needs expanding? (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joliet_Regional_Airport) And how do a make the airport code KJOT or JOT redirect to this article. Thanks Creez34 (talk) 05:20, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
![]() | Sabre (talk) 21:00, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply] |
please check the link before reverting again. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.142.212.126 (talk) 06:46, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Have you read the talk page on this one? There has been discussion for two months as to what jewish terrorism means. People argue with out any references that it means religious terrorism. Please familiarise yourself with this, and explain where my bias is. I am not perfect, but I do not understand quite what you mean.93.96.148.42 (talk) 07:10, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I don't understand why you make a personal attack, instead of explaining where your idea that "Jewish terrorism" must mean religious terrorism comes from. I have googled it, and a lot of other stuff comes up, from reputable sources - if you have the references please share them - there has been a request for a reference since december, and I do not understand why you have not provided one.93.96.148.42 (talk) 08:01, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.