|
HiTubesleveret15! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 28 March 2021 (UTC) |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wars of national liberation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Liberation Front. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. Thank you for your contributionstoWikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → 
Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.
Thanks! Rsk6400 (talk) 05:27, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks! Aoi (青い) (talk) 18:31, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there. the Ann Radcliffe article is on my watch list, so I was alerted to your recent edits which I have no issues with. Only one small, fairly common punctuation quibble that invites a reminder: the contraction "it's" means "it is". The correct possessive form is always "its", sans apostrophe. Cliffewiki (talk) 13:12, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Tubesleveret15. Thank you very much for your recent edit on the article Giovanni Battista Rinuccini. You seem to be an expert on Irish matters. You changed Protestant English -> Commonwealth of England. That looks good because it replaces a quite vague term with a better defined one. One might comment that at the time when Rinuccini arrived in Ireland (1645) the Commonwealth did not yet exist as it was only created in 1649. Perhaps you can return to the article and find a better solution. With many thanks and best regards, Johannes Schade (talk) 06:07, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Sorry I reverted you there - please see my edit summary ... can we fix this? Cheers DBaK (talk) 19:36, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Melting pot, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nativism.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
He’s not sheikh as this name only used to an Arab tribes leader and he’s not an Arab Plus, his real name is Mahmoud hafid ghaffori barazanjie. He also made an ally with the Israeli Aramaic to get an independent Kurdistan at the fight with the king of Iraq at the time . Justice12345678910 (talk) 05:32, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
An article you edited not long ago is nominated for deletion (spoiler alert: I voted to delete, it'll never be a good article) --Cornellier (talk) 23:49, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Robert Brownrigg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peter Hunter.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
