Contents

User talk:Twitbookspacetube

You are topic-banned from all American politics-related WP:BLP content for three months.

You have been sanctioned for the reasons provided in response to this arbitration enforcement request.

This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/American politics 2#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you.  Sandstein  21:11, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Old enemies rear their heads and all I got was this lousy topic ban. Thanks for the notice. Twitbookspacetube 00:39, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Just to clarify, since I have now been indeffed for at least 6 months, does this topic ban now run concurrently, or does the timer stop until I get unbanned? Twitbookspacetube 13:49, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That would be part of a community unban discussion (Cyberpower hasn't posted here yet, but to be clear: you've been community sitebanned, not just indef blocked), and no one knows in advance what direction that would go. For example, it is possible, even likely, that if the siteban is ever removed, the community would make all your editing restrictions indefinite. And/or add more of them. --Floquenbeam (talk) 14:07, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It appears you're aware of this, but just to dot the i's and cross the t's, since it hasn't been posted here yet: Per this close of a community ban discussion by User:Cyberpower678, you've been indefinitely community banned. Cyberpower notes in his close that you may appeal this ban in 6 months. --Floquenbeam (talk) 14:13, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I forgot to actually leave a message regarding this ban. Per the strong consensus that developed at AN in the 24 hours of discussion on whether to ban you or not, you are hereby indefinitely community banned from the English Wikipedia. You may appeal this ban after 6 months.—CYBERPOWER (Chat) 14:20, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rather than getting bent out of shape and yelling about how unfair it is, I'm working to prove, through actions on other wikiprojects, that I am actually here to build an encyclopedia. This will be the last thing I post here until such time as the appeal time comes up. See you in late Feb/early Mar 2018. Twitbookspacetube 09:15, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Very mature and responsible of you. If you carry through with that, your appeal in 6 months should go well. Just a neutral comment.—CYBERPOWER (Chat) 09:19, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I know I said I wouldn't post anything here until my ban appeal, but I can't let an arbitration committee member directly calling me a troll go unchallanged. Especially since I filed the request in good faith on behalf of the community. I may have been wrong about WP:INVOLVED, but that was an honest mistake, not an attempt to troll.

In addition, I would like to provide evidence to the "Arthur Rubin" case - as such, if someone would be willing to copy/paste the following to the evidence page - it would be much appreciated.

Hi there - I will not be allowing talk page access to this account as you've engaged in abusive editting even today. If you wish to appeal, it will need to be after 19 December 2023. I'll email the CU list and if anyone there disagrees, they're free to allow an appeal from your talk page. TonyBallioni (talk) 00:39, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]