Contents

User talk:Varghese T Mathew

HiVarghese T Mathew! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Idukki Orthodox Diocese, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 08:05, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Thumpamon Orthodox Diocese, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 08:39, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Your formatting on your edit here. Extra spaces, missing spaces, extra linefeeds... Adakiko (talk) 08:39, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please read help:referencing for beginners. wp:verifiability is extremely important on Wikipedia, so wp:cite your wp:reliable sources (RS). To make a bulleted list see MOS:BULLETLIST. For an enumerated list, see MOS:NUMLIST Much simpler and easier to edit this way. For everything on style, see wp:Manual of style Thank you Adakiko (talk) 08:48, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• In addition, generally avoid using honorifics and credentials, e.g. "Dr." wp:HONORIFIC wp:CREDENTIAL Adakiko (talk) 08:53, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! --PerpetuityGrat (talk) 20:12, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Bsoyka. I noticed that in this edittoIdukki Orthodox Diocese, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Bsoyka (talk · contribs) 04:30, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Idukki Orthodox Diocese, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 05:28, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedia needs to be wp:verifiable unsourced edits may be removed. See help:referencing for beginners. See wp:reliable sources (RS) as what is and is not an acceptable source. wp:original research is not verifiable and is therefore not accepted as being sourced. If you are unwilling to add citations to your edits, you probably should not be editing here. Thank you Adakiko (talk) 05:28, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did with this edittoDelhi Orthodox Diocese, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 06:25, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you blank out or remove content from Wikipedia, as you did with this edittoDelhi Orthodox Diocese. Materialscientist (talk) 06:28, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• In response to your talk on my talk page, and that of Materialscientist (talk · contribs), I would suggest you read wp:Verifiability, not truth. Adakiko (talk) 07:14, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OnThoma IX, you piped "Malankara OrthodoxSyrian Church" (with OrthodoxSyrian run together) Should it link directly to Malankara Church or to Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church? The article links to different articles Malankara Church (Puthenkur) and Malankara Syrian Church both of which wp:redirecttoMalankara Church. Your edit "Malankara OrthodoxSyrian Church" which eventually gets to Malankara Church. Adakiko (talk) 03:47, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Mavelikara Orthodox Diocese, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Elizium23 (talk) 05:26, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]