Hello, I'm AtticusX. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Paraguay, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. AtticusX (talk) 15:33, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 01:21, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
To be very clear, you are not entitled to expect other editors to create non-existent categories for you. If you want the category to exist, then it's your responsibility to make it exist, and you are not entitled to give anybody any guff about not doing it for you.
For starters, we don't create categories to hold one article — there would have to be at least five things to file in ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:Nueva Asunción before it's allowed to exist, and below five things it doesn't get to have its own category at all. So I can't create the category for you if I don't already have the background of Paraguay needed to identify at least four other things that would belong in the category, because it cannot be created for just one thing.
So you need to follow the rules, and you need to follow the rules without giving me any snarkback about them. Bearcat (talk) 11:01, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
