|
 | This user is one of the 500 most active English Wikipedians of all time. |
The Signpost News Archives:
2011 * 2012 * 2013 * 2014 * 2015 * 2016 * 2017 * 2018 * 2019 * 2020 * 2021 * 2022 * 2023 * 2024 * 2025
Hi Wagino 20100516. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! FASTILY (TALK) 05:31, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
None of your edits have been minor, especially the ones where you revert from redirect. It's disruptive to mark these kinds of edits as minor, per WP:MINOR, so quit it. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 19:02, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Wagino
In the last few weeks, you have created 109 new categories, in these edits[1].
Nearly of them are parented in a non-existent category of the form "Populated places in Foo". For example, Category:Rural localities in Selemdzhinsky District is et up as a sub-category of Category:Populated places in Selemdzhinsky District, which does not exist.
Per WP:REDNOT,
A page in any Wikipedia namespace should never be left in a red-linked category. Either the category should be created, or else the non-existent category link should be removed or changed to one that exists.
Because this is an error, it is tracked at Special:WantedCategories, where editors try to fix the problems.
Your edits have flooded Special:WantedCategories with 117 entries, which you can see at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:WantedCategories&limit=500&offset=500
Please fix this as soon as possible.
Thanks,--BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 09:24, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Done It (seem) has been done. Wagino 20100516 (talk) 15:26, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Done You're welcome and thank you for your correction. Wagino 20100516 (talk) 16:08, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
--BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 16:11, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]Hey, did you mean to self-revert your update here - [2]?♠PMC♠ (talk) 12:10, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Wagino 20100516,
It looks like you are an experienced editor but you can't just tag a page "delete" and invent your own reason. Please review Criteria for Speedy Deletion so you are aware of the accepted and valid criteria for speedy deletion, when they apply and to which namespace they apply to. It also would help if you learn to use Twinkle, an editing tool, to tag pages for deletion. With Twinkle, when you tag pages for deletion, it opens up a small window that presents the variety of different criteria that may apply which you can pick from. It makes deletion tagging very easy and straight-forward and presents pages in a way that administrators who review them, are very familiar with.
When you invent your own reason for why a page should be deleted, an administrator has to try to understand your point and make their own guess on which criteria might apply which can be time-consuming and also means that your deletion requests will sit there until an admin comes along who doesn't mind doing this. Using the standard deletion criteria in an appropriate manner, makes it easier for admins who review deletion requests and are much less likely that your deletion requests will be denied. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 02:09, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Wagino;
I got a notice that a User Page CWH was set up in the Malay Wikipedia, apparently by you? It's here.
All the best ch (talk) 23:40, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I invite you to please join the discussion at Talk:Sarah Azhari.
Hello, we are seeking help with the Sarah Azhari article, created in 2013 & recently the subject of a deletion proposal. At issue was whether or not the Indonesian language sources establish notability. I am inviting you to the discussion at Talk:Sarah Azhari#Help with Indonesian language sources because you are in the Category:User id-N & have a minimum of 1,000 edits across all Wikimedia projects.
I realize that some of you are very busy while others may no longer be editing. Nevertheless, I thought it wise to consult with you.
Thank your for the work that you do on Wiki[mp]edia! Peaceray (talk) 21:06, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Wagino 20100516,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
— Moops ⋠T⋡ 02:41, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
— Moops ⋠T⋡ 02:41, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hai, Wagino 20100516, saya hanya ingin menyampaikan bahwa komentar anda sebagai pengurus pada Wikipedia Indonesia keliru, saya tidak pernah diblokir secara global, harap segera anda ralat. Saya terkena blokir sewenang-wenang di Wikipedia Indonesia justru karena penyalahgunaan alat pengurus oleh pengurus dengan nama pengguna Herryz. Sampai sekarang belum ada respon dari pengurus-pengurus lain terkait penyalahgunaan tersebut di WP:WKK. Salam. Jellylovers (talk) 22:34, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
