Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Geardona were:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
Outside of the lede, is un-cited, please add references to the section.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Semantic Brand Score and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, WarmKomorebi!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Geardona (talk to me?) 21:57, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have edited the draft following your suggestions (making the content different from the previously deleted page and adding verifyeable and reputable secondary sources). I think the previous page was deleted mostly because, at the time, there were no real secondary sources. I have found many now (which also describe the metric in details) and added them to the article. I have also made the page differente from the previous. But I am new here :). Can you help me and tell me if it looks good to you and I can now resubmit? WarmKomorebi (talk) 10:33, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It still needs more citations, preferably 1+ per paragraph. You can resubmit at any time and a different reviewer will go over it. It still looks similar to the deleted version, have you read the deletion discussion? It may have helpful info. Geardona (talk to me?) 11:15, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you I added all citations that I have found. I read the old discussion when one citation only was available, but now I found several, also listed in the article talk page.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Semantic Brand Score and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Thanks a lot for your suggestion! I edited the article to use a proper formal tone and with a neutral point of view. I am resubmitting. Please let me know if you see any additional edit that shuold be made in this regard (or it would be great if you want to change the article directly). WarmKomorebi (talk) 16:54, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
