|
Hey there, I noticed you made some additions to the Eyetech article. I was wondering where you found your sources and wheter or not you know of any other places where I can find Eyetech related information, as I'm struggling to find sources --Skamecrazy123 (talk) 14:04, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I think it all seems to be somewhat original research really - without specific figures/details on things like sales/revenue/loss, perhaps it's just better to state the known fact that they discontinued the product. Mdwh (talk) 02:17, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading File:Mwb preview.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.
For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:05, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. I see that you tagged an article that I have written, Commodore USA, as possibly not meeting WP:N. Usually when an article is new like that the author is notified on their talk page that their article has been tagged. Anyway, a simple Google News search should help you find all that you need to see that this company is notable. Have a great day! Illinois2011 (talk) 18:19, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Updated criticism. Check it. Rastavox (talk) 22:15, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
|
The Writer's Barnstar |
| For your large number of edits regarding Amiga related articles among others :) Marko75 (talk) 02:02, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply] |
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Xorxos. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
