Contents

User talk:Yobot

This is Yobot's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11Auto-archiving period: 21 days

Please edit this page only if you want to stop Yobot. For comments and questions about its actions please use Magioladitis' talk page.

Dear User:Magioladitis, could you please have a look at this edit: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Odenbach_%28Glan%29&type=revision&diff=997650210&oldid=994164132 ? Before this edit, the article was readable, after that it is not. (I am not interested in the subject, i came to the article while repairing nbsp accidents, i.e. when "nbsp" is by accident displayed in the read view. I am de-N, en-2.) Himbeerbläuling (talk) 13:39, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear User:Knightoften, i suppose my complaint against the bot is about the same issue as your êdit two sections above here. Do you know whether it had consequences? Thank you in advance. --Himbeerbläuling (talk) 18:11, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Himbeerbläuling Hi! One of the sections was made entirely unreadable, with error messages visible when just viewing the page. After I undid the bot's edit, the text seems fine! I believe the bot is attempting to change "formatting blanks." The Odenbach (Glan) article you were looking at appears to have the same type of graphic as in the Bempflingen article. Knightoften (talk) 23:02, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. --Himbeerbläuling (talk) 06:25, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Yobot , in 2016, you have marked Shailendra Raj Mehta with "BLP" tag, I have reviewed the content and it seems updated with relevant references. Can you remove the tags or allow me to remove that? Njoy deep (talk) 10:34, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See Template talk:Em#Bad bot behavior. All that conversion of <em> element to <i> (with '' markup) needs to be undone.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  21:55, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]