Contents

User talk:Yuanfangdelang

Welcome to Wikipedia, Yuanfangdelang! I'm CordeliaNaismith (talk), another Wikipedian. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! CordeliaNaismith (talk) 04:26, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Please use the redirect button (the #R at the top of the edit box) to create redirects. You're not doing it right. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:55, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! In order to do redirects, click on the "#R" tab on top of the page in edit mode. For example, if I wanted to redirect to the article on George Washington, the redirect page would look like this:

#REDIRECT [[George Washington]]

Hope this helps. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 02:38, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Hi again. I know you mean well, but you're still not doing it right. Please review the repair I made to your last redirect and please take a moment to clean up your previous contributions before you create any more new redirects. Thanks. PMDrive1061 (talk) 02:44, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Random threshold variable has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia is not a dictionary.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Glenfarclas  (talk) 06:11, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there,

I just noticed the article you are putting together, and wondered if you have some R implementation of it.

Good luck with keeping the article alive,

Talgalili (talk) 21:02, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Talgalili,

I am sorry I have no R implementation. I did the FGTRA in SAS in interactive mode. I hope this article can be kept in wiki since this is a new methodology in Statistics.

Yuanfangdelang (talk)

The article Mathematical assumption has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Common phrase, understandable by virtue of its component words. There is no technical use that needs to be explained.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Trovatore (talk) 06:26, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Functionalized general trichotomy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability of this concept per WP:N

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nsk92 (talk) 02:13, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Functionalized general trichotomic regression analysis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of satisfying WP:N, the only references are to the author of this concept

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nsk92 (talk) 03:34, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I removed the tag that someone else put on: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Threshold_in_piecewise_regression_analysis

But, I believe the article needs a bit more attention. And encourage you to see if you can extend it.

All the best, and thank you for sharing your knowledge with me and everyone else :)

Talgalili (talk) 20:52, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Threshold in piecewise regression analysis, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Threshold in piecewise regression analysis. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:43, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I wanted to let you know that after further thought, I agree with the deletion of this article as an article. But encourage you to expend on this subject on the article of piecewise regression analysis. All the best, Talgalili (talk) 16:13, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Constant expectation (statistics) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lacks notability and single-source usage

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Melcombe (talk) 14:25, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Weighted PRA has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Has no notability, lack of content

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Melcombe (talk) 16:41, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 15:05, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion has begun about whether the article Piecewise regression analysis, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Piecewise regression analysis until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Melcombe (talk) 12:49, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Enforced continuity has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable topic, no useful content

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Melcombe (talk) 13:04, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]