The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Unremarkable game. No claim of notability. damiens.rf 16:48, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete A game someone designed, referenced only to Facebook and websites related to the game designer. No evidence of notability to satisfy WP:N, and no claim of notability.Searching for "chicken lines" has too many unrelated results related to real chickens to be sure no coverage exists; if some independent and reliable sources have significant coverage of this game, now would be a good time to mention them here and/or add them to the article. Edison (talk) 17:15, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Unremarkable game; no news reports or industry commentary. Scholarly sources talk only about the process of breeding chickens, not a game. Binksternet (talk) 17:17, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No significant coverage in reliable sources. Qrsdogg (talk) 19:21, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete per Wikipedia:N. This page is clearly for propaganda and search engine results show only that website. IMHO, I think the user should warned for advertisement. SwisterTwister (talk) 06:35, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per lack of "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" (WP:GNG). Guoguo12(Talk) 02:44, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.