The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment: It seems this company gets a lot of mentions in multiple sources. While I am not so willing to simply suggest a delete, the article needs to be expanded and far better sourced for me to opine a keep. WP:SEP under WP:ITJ anyone? Schmidt, Michael Q. 10:34, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
In some cases I'm eager to expand tne article after good sources are uncovered, but because of WP:BOGO, not this one. See WP:COIN#Raju Kapuria and others (permlink) for reasons why I think this article is tainted. Others may have a different conclusion, which is fine, but this is mine. – Brianhe (talk) 13:22, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.