The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
It seems that the "Populated places without legal recognition" paragraph of GEOLAND notability guideline applies (it is not mentioned in the 2011 census). If so, then the subject requires non-trivial coverage in multiple, independent RS, and when insufficient the more general article (egKohima) should include it. Batternut (talk) 11:04, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.