The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete. Minimal GS cites. Article created too early. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:47, 14 December 2009 (UTC).[reply]
Delete. There's no evidence presented within the article that he passes any of the criteria of WP:PROForWP:GNG and I wasn't able to turn up any such evidence by searching Google scholar and Google news. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:26, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete -- using "publish or perish", I came up with an h-index of 11 (with no highly cited papers). This isn't terribly impressive for someone at associate level, and there's nothing else to go on that I can find. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 08:32, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. WoS shows 20 peer-reviewed papers, but the citations are pretty low: 7, 6, 4, 4, 3, 3, 3, 2... for an h-index of 4. These numbers are not characteristic of a notable associate professor. Respectfully, Agricola44 (talk) 16:13, 17 December 2009 (UTC).[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.