The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was No consensus default to keep. Beeblebrox (talk) 03:10, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
That's the intent. Regardless of whether this stub meets the criteria for notability or not, I believe grouping stubs into an article like List of miscellaneous minor planet discoverers is the way to go.
The guidelines for notability state: "The person has made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in his or her specific field." In the specific field of astronomy, this astronomer has discovered several asteroids and supernovae, and these discoveries are now in the permanent astronomical record (journals and the IAU's Minor Planet Center (MPC) asteroid lists). The problem is defining what is meant by "widely recognised". No astronomer would deny he's a minor planet and supernova discoverer, since no astronomer would deny the validity of the MPC data entries. This falls in a gray zone. Urhixidur (talk) 15:20, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
More hits can be obtained by searching the NASA ADS for "M. Aoki", although these are intertwined with at least one other M. Aoki's publications (a particle physicist).
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Timotheus Canens (talk) 05:27, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
