Contents

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natalie Kabra

Natalie Kabra[edit]

Natalie Kabra (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

per Wikipedia:Notability (fiction). Fictional character with no indication of why a dedicated article is required. Could be adequately covered in the article on the book series. Contested redirect. RadioFan (talk) 21:49, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Not enough content to warrant a stand-alone article. RadManCF ☢ open frequency 00:02, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• (edit conflict)Merge - I say we create a List of 39 Clues characters and have all of the characters covered there. The same applies for Amy Cahill, Grace Cahill, and Ian Kabra. Airplaneman ✈ 00:03, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep unlike other characters listed in the 39 Clues article, Natalie Kabra is a significant character. If there is no individual article, there should be an article for each team. --mono 01:29, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• @Airplaneman- Amy Cahill is a protagonist in the series.--mono 01:34, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment per Wikipedia:Notability (fiction)#Derivative articles, "articles about fictional works should not be split and split again into ever more minutiae of detail". This can be adequately covered in the main article. There is nothing in this 2 sentence article that indicates that it warrants its own article. The fact that she is a protagonist does not gauntness notability. The only references provided are to tbe book series itself and not to significant coverage in 3rd party sources. There is nothing here that indicates that a dedicated article is necessary.--RadioFan (talk) 01:40, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• 2 different characters, 2 different discussions.--mono 01:47, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:05, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:05, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete or merge into one big list. As a supporting character, does not warrant her own article. If she's "significant", at least put that in the article!  fetchcomms☛ 01:55, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete or merge into a new article concerning the Kabra family. -Mktsay123 (talk) 16:27, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge back into List of teams in The 39 Clues for now at least. The teams article is nowhere near requiring a split since it was just split from the main article itself. VernoWhitney (talk) 18:31, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.