The result was delete. A potentially decent topic, but the current article doesn't cut it and there's no good version to revert to. It will have to be rewritten from scratch, as there's nothing salvageable here. faithless (speak) 08:03, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Article contains nothing but original research and unverified claims. Also, it's very one-sided, discussing only negative symbols. Possibly falls under WP:CSD#G4 but I can't prove that the deleted article is anything like this one. PeterSymonds | talk 17:05, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]