The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Article was deleted via expired PROD (see log) in January and was recreated last month. I still cannot find any reliable secondary sources that can provide any verifability nor establish any notability. The only stuff I can find are trivial mentions or the same basic description on mirrors that host this game.
I am also nominating the following related article for deletion for the exact same reason as above:
Delete, almost the entire article reads like a Game Guide, and the article itself questions the significance of the game. In addition, the two see-also links are infact referral links, thus I believe that this article may have been created with the intention to drum up extra 'clicks' to that user's area on another site. I will remove those links now, but even so, the article still fails WP:N and WP:GAMEGUIDE --Taelus (talk) 08:02, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete both per A7; the only assertion of notability is the former game's supposed featuring on Armor Games, which isn't really what I'd call an "indication" of notability. Haipa Doragon (talk • contributions) 19:29, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete - these are browser-based games. I love the "Significance" section: "Warlords:Call to Arms is not a significant game, but it is significant enough to be put on [Armour Games]." Marasmusine (talk) 11:34, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
