The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was Approved.
@Legacypac: Well I made it at your request if I recall correctly. 2 "issues" so far: this does not remove drafts that have been blanked, since that would require parsing all of the drafts. It also does not yet remove links that have multiple html classes ("new" (redlinked) and something else). These aren't bugs per se, but merely limitations on the effect of the bot. I'll try to solve the second, but the 1st would need a whole different approach. Just wanted to temper your expectations. Second issue resolved! --DannyS712 (talk) 02:20, 28 March 2019 (UTC) --DannyS712 (talk) 21:38, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Xaosflux and Legacypac:Trial complete. 50 edits made ([1]). I didn't see any issues, except for the 2 limitations described above (now 1). I ran this whenever there was even 1 page to remove, so I could review each edit, but if approved this would likely run between once per day and once per week. Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 02:35, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It looks to be working correctly. Blank(ed) pages can be manually removed as needed unless you come up with a better solution. Legacypac (talk) 03:23, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Legacypac: I agree that, for now, they need to be manually removed. If I ever have a good solution to automatically remove them, I'll let you know and probably file a new BRFA. --DannyS712 (talk) 16:54, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Approved.. If you have any questions, please direct to the talk page and ping me if needed. This approval does not, at this time, extend to the automatic removal of blank(ed) pages as specified by DannyS712 28 March 2019 (above). To change this, open a discussion on the talk page & ping and we will take it from there. --TheSandDoctorTalk21:04, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.