The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was Denied.
@Xaosflux:Thank you for your valuable advice. I always remember to put sign after my post. But that day I forgot to add it. I will try to put sign after my posts. Kindly please forgive to me. This is the right Diff. Thank you.--PATH SLOPU (Talk)05:58, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Please make one of each of these edits, using your normal account and reply with the Diffs here - seeing an example is very useful for review. — xaosfluxTalk17:11, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Makes sense, I suppose. So will you also be ranking the articles as well based on the criteria of each individual WikiProject? To be honest this is starting to sound more like an AWB task given how much manual editing will be required. Primefac (talk) 15:20, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Primefac:Did you mean the ranking of articles is about stub, start, featured etc? If the article size(bytes) comparatively less we can add stub in the 'class' of template. Like we can give other rankings. In WP:KLM articles are about Kollam, a city and district in India. If the article are stubs we can give low in importance in template. If article is good or featured, it will be high importanct. Because the most of stub articles are about small villages and it have low or mid importance in Wiki project. Good and featured articles are about places and institutions in metropolitan and town area. So we can give rankings to articles. Thank you.PATH SLOPU (Talk)12:07, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Your methodology doesn't sound incorrect, I just know that it's not quite as easy as "it's a certain size so it's a stub" or "it's a city so it's low-importance." Primefac (talk) 17:35, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Primefac:Thank you. The Metropolitan areas are highly important to WP:KLM. We can find the size of article, because there are lot of information in Wikipedia (eg:Kollam). So we can add banner template according to that. Thank you.PATH SLOPU (Talk)07:38, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This bot appears to have edited since this BRFA was filed. Bots may not edit outside their own or their operator's userspace unless approved or approved for trial. AnomieBOT⚡14:50, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: The parameters of this request are incredibly vague/non-specific; it's unclear what changes will be made and which page(s) will be affected. FWIW adding wiki project banners/talk page headers should be done via AWB to avoid errors. Unless the scope is narrowed/better defined, this should probably be declined. -FASTILY05:30, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Fastily:Sir, I used pywikibot for this bot. I would like to place wikiproject banners in talk page with this bot. If AWB is good for it, can I get it? Can I use it for bot instead of pywikibot? Can I replace it with AWB? Kindly please help me sir.PATH SLOPU (Talk)13:51, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Fastily:Sir, thank you for your help. But one I have one problem that I'm using linux. Is it affect the bot? Sir, I have one more doubt that when I requesting AWB from which account I should place the request- with my normal account or bot account?PATH SLOPU (Talk)06:09, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I believe that this request is very vague as Fastily mentions above. Additionally, it looks like the operator isn't ready to run a bot yet. Please submit a new, detailed request when you have automated editing software up and running, and you can narrow the scope of your request. Denied.SQLQuery me!10:39, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.