Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2016 August 30#Category:Our Lady of the Hens
You're wrongly equating common usage and clarity. A term can be infrequently used (though, as an aside, this term is frequently used, as established in past RfCs) without suffering any loss of clarity, so it's disingenuous to suggest that your "vote is a preference for clarity".Yes, the terminology in an American context is pretty consistently "pro-life" and I think that's clearer.
Perhaps in theory (if you ask the Vatican), but I'm sure that a number of women religious in the National Coalition of American Nuns and Catholics for Choice would beg to differ, as those articles clearly indicate.Presumably, every Roman Catholic religious is, but she's not noted for that.
Did you not read the RfC linked below (WP:RFC/AAMC) in which that issue is discussed?And this status quo to which you are referring is a figment of your imagination.
If you believe there to be anti-death-penalty activists who are not anti-abortion, yes, they should be removed if renamed (and possibly irrespective of renaming, as the category tree has always – since the category's creation – made clear that it is intended for anti-abortion activists). Graham (talk) 21:47, 29 August 2016 (UTC) Please ping me.[reply]If these are re-named, are you going to purge anyone (especially WP:BLPs) who are not of the narrower definition you claim for the terminology?
Premise 1: Wikipedia should cover the United States pro-choice and pro-life movements as distinct topics with their own articles […]
Premise 2: The articles currently titled Support for the legalization of abortion and Opposition to legal abortion were originally about the United States pro-choice and pro-life movements, with that scope later expanding to include abortion advocacy movements outside the US […]
Conclusion: Support for the legalization of abortion and Opposition to legal abortion should be moved so as to clearly and unambiguously identify their topics as being the United States pro-choice and pro-life movements, respectively […]
Title option 2: United States pro-choice movement and United States pro-life movement
Note: The following are previous discussions related to this issue:
I have notified the participants of the 3 most recent discussions. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 20:39, 17 August 2016 (UTC) [reply]
actual facts on the groundare that the articles about certain US cities don't use the state names, and this should be fixed - either by moving the articles or by renaming the categories. Personally, I support the latter, so I support Option A. I would also like to point out the immediate cause for this nomination (the category listed in Option B, where a speedy renaming request was rejected). עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 19:16, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]