The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: The superior category is Category:Reggaeton musicians. There are 6 categories of reggaeton artists which can be speedily renamed if this is agreed. I dont think we should use the term "artists" when we are talking about musicians. Its a source of confusion. Rathfelder (talk) 22:21, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Support per the nominator's point. There are a number of common surnames for which the surname can have multiple unrelated origins, so "sharing" is too close of a term. BD2412T22:35, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support—I created the 'people sharing a surname' category in 2008. I think the nominator's argument for renaming is a good one. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 02:00, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: delete as a trivial characteristic. Nowadays almost every exam or test is at least partly on multiple choice basis. Marcocapelle (talk) 13:02, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. "Nowadays almost every exam or test is at least partly on multiple choice basis": is there a source for this? AFAIK, for instance, projective tests, and French high school and university examinations, are almost never multiple choices, and cognitive tests are often not multiple choices either. Anyway, WP should not address only current topics. Apokrif (talk) 13:17, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: "Possibly rename to Category:Multiple choice school examinations ": many multiple choice tests are not school examinations. Apokrif (talk) 04:30, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete these should be merged to "Standardized Test" categories or "Psychological Test" categories if they aren't already there. The category is radically incomplete and shouldn't be completed, as it is generally not a defining property. User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 23:29, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete . There are huge numbers of assessment tools, of many kinds and many use Multiple choice, but this is not a defining characteristic. Rathfelder (talk) 15:38, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The Clinical Knowledge 2 article says that that exam assesses knowledge through "a traditional, multiple-choice examination", which suggests to me that this is not defining even where it is specified in the article. – FayenaticLondon23:10, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Contributors to the Oxford English Dictionary[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
