Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 Examples  





2 Notes  














Wikipedia:Disinfoboxes: a refutation







Add links
 









Project page
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 
















Appearance
   

 






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


The essay Disinfoboxes claims that "Disinfoboxes are infobox templates that add no value to articles". This is very misleading. The value added to articles by infoboxes is inherent and is evident in:

The essay is often cited as a reason not to add an infobox to an article. This ignores the part which reads "save it by either correcting false information, removing all subjective fields, or adding useful information". Of course, such corrections should be made to any part of Wikipedia, and are not infobox-specific.

The essay's bogus claims include:

If the infobox is longer than a third of the article's body, it is a disinfobox.
The length of an infobox very much depends on the user's settings (screen and window size, font and font-size, etc.)
If the infobox contains multiple entries within any identifying field, it is probably a disinfobox.
Multiple values are appropriate and valid in many "identifying" infobox parameters, such as |native_name=, |former_name= and |nickname=. Templates such as {{Plainlist}} exist to facilitate their use.
If the infobox contains subjective categories, it is a disinfobox.
Since infoboxes do not contain categories, the meaning of this statement is unclear. More widely, subjective statements do not belong in Wikipedia anyway; this is again not an infobox-specific issue.

Examples[edit]

Ron Richardson
Born

Ronald E. Richardson


(1952-01-27)January 27, 1952
DiedApril 5, 1995(1995-04-05) (aged 43)
Occupations
  • Actor
  • baritone vocalist
  • Years active1970s-1994
    Awards
  • Tony Award for Best Actor in a Musical (1985)
  • Laura Esterman
    Born (1945-04-12) April 12, 1945 (age 79)
    Occupation(s)Film, television and radio actress
    Awards
  • Obie Award for Distinguished Performance by an Actress (1992)
  • Ponte Vecchio
    View of the Ponte Vecchio from above
    Coordinates43°46′4.76″N 11°15′11.49″E / 43.7679889°N 11.2531917°E / 43.7679889; 11.2531917
    CrossesArno River
    LocaleFlorence, Italy
    Characteristics
    DesignClosed-spandrel segmental stone arch bridge
    Width32 metres (105 ft)
    Longest span30 metres (98 ft)
    Location
    Map

    All three of the example infoboxes given in the essay no longer reflect the actual state of the articles to which they belong. At the time of writing, they appear as shown here.[2] Their value is clear.

    Notes[edit]

    1. ^ For example, it's unusual to see them in list articles, or on disambiguation pages.
  • ^ Non-free image has been replaced; title-display of coordinates has been deactivated.

  • Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Disinfoboxes:_a_refutation&oldid=932122346"

    Categories: 
    Wikipedia essays
    Wikipedia essays about infoboxes
    Hidden categories: 
    Pages using gadget WikiMiniAtlas
    Infobox mapframe without OSM relation ID on Wikidata
    Pages using the Kartographer extension
     



    This page was last edited on 23 December 2019, at 16:15 (UTC).

    Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



    Privacy policy

    About Wikipedia

    Disclaimers

    Contact Wikipedia

    Code of Conduct

    Developers

    Statistics

    Cookie statement

    Mobile view



    Wikimedia Foundation
    Powered by MediaWiki