I am renominating this list because FL director Matt stated I could immediately renominate it since the last FLC only had one support, and only one reviewer reviewed it. The same statements I made in the previous FLC apply here as well, any other comments will be addressed.--TRUCO18:03, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
How about now? I'm not sure what resolution you're using, but I am also using FF 3, and they work fine for me. If it still doesn't I'll just remove them.--TRUCO19:30, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Some of the first paragraph and all of the second paragraph, which is basically half of the article itself, contains no citations of where the information came from. — Moeε19:45, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Lets start this over, the first paragraph is sourced by the refs that are there. The beginning of that paragraph is sourced by the general reference, which serves as a ref to the entire article (prose and list). The second paragraph is not sourced because per an accepted FL standard, the summary paragraph does not need references because since it is a summary of the list, the references in the list cover for that paragraph, so there is no need for inline citations for that paragraph. In addition, that paragraph is also sourced by the general reference.TRUCO20:41, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I still prefer inline citations, but if the information is actually cited in someone way then I'm fine with it. — Moeε21:08, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]