The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete The image is a poor-quality image given an unduly prominent part of a montage in the infobox of the article on the city of Amaravati. The montage would look much better without it. The rationale given at File:Amaravati Government complex.jpg says that the article as a whole is dedicated specifically to a discussion of this work. That is not true. It also claims that the image is not replaceable - but since the buildings still exist, there is nothing to stop the uploader getting a camera and taking their own photographs of the buildings.-- Toddy1(talk)09:35, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
I'm not able to discuss about that point so I can't state whether this is true or not. Probably other users give us more info about this topic. Nothing more from my part, thank you. Fma12 (talk) 15:24, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Please do not delete this audio file as some people need it to hear the song and hear the instruments that were mentioned under "composition". Just because you think it's an example of illiteracy doesn't mean it is, people really do need it. 41.114.190.152 (talk) 14:05, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Not solely on length. The assumption that readers won't understand one of the Korean songs without this sample screams assumption of illiteracy, IMO. Reading the article, readers would already figure out it's a Korean song, and uses of music from other cultures would be already understood, even when description about the whole music within the "Composition" section is brief yet concise.
Compare samples to screenshots: they still need to contextually signify respective topics in question. If omitting this sample doesn't impact the understanding of the song, then the sample may not be contextually significant after all. George Ho (talk) 20:01, 12 June 2024 (UTC); edited, 16:16, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your comment is very insensitive because you cannot assume that one is illiterate only off of a song sample.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Hi, I uploaded this audio file before I knew about WP:SAMPLE. I'll upload a reduced version (which should be about 0:15 seconds, since the Undertale version is half a minute longer than the original recording) when I get home. P.S. this file clearly has a purpose, and should not have been listed for deletion. λNegativeMP115:15, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment If I may, the above assertion regarding the length per WP:SAMPLE is based on the time in the infobox, which is the duration of the original version. The version illustrated from Undertale is [[1]] is 2 minutes 36 seconds in length (additionally verified by the wikia here short of ripping it from the OST itself). Would it be viable to use a 23 second clip with this in consideration, so it can go past the opening section?--Kung Fu Man (talk) 15:21, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Remove from Sans (Undertale). The sample might or might not enhance readers' understanding of a video game character, but I'm unconvinced that omitting it from the character article would impact such understanding, especially now that the instrumental itself has its own article. Furthermore, there's already a character image as the lead image. Why is the sample needed other than some mere character association? (Even I don't see why a sample of the Super Mario Bros. theme should be used in the Mario article.) George Ho (talk) 20:12, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Remove from Sans (Undertale). Upon careful examination, I fail to identify any logical justification or significant purpose for the inclusion of this particular file within the context of the article. Moreover, its presence could potentially be perceived as a violation of the Wikipedia guideline on trivial content, commonly referred to as WP:Fancruft. It is worth noting that in the age of easily accessible online platforms like YouTube, where users can readily listen to the song in question, the necessity of embedding this file becomes increasingly questionable. From the perspective of maintaining a high standard of encyclopedic quality, the file in question may not offer substantial value to the general readership but rather be considered extraneous information or "cruft" in this context. Consequently, given its limited relevance and potential diversion from the primary objective of delivering informative and educational content, a strong case can be made for the removal of this file from the article to enhance the overall reader experience and uphold the integrity of the information presented. 39.50.245.89 (talk) 12:51, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
My take on it would be that they aren't redundant since neither's clearly inferior, or at least the first could be adjusted so it wouldn't be. (I myself tend to upload an extra photo or two of the same subject so editors can have some discretion, excited to find out if I've been doing it wrong this whole time!) hinnk (talk) 03:25, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Comment: I had uploaded the cover for the Always Remember Us This Way article, but it was removed by @GagaNutella: stating that "it was not the official cover" for the single (see edit summary).
