This peer review discussion has been closed.
Hi Guys! I've listed the article international labor standards for peer review because I've recently made substantive additions to this article in the areas titled "monitoring international labor standards" and "violations of labor standards" as part of a classroom assignment for Rice University. I was hoping to see if there would be any super awesome editors who would be willing to read over those two sections in particular to see areas that could be improved. General feedback over the entire article would also be greatly appreciated.
Thanks!, Hihappy21 (talk) 01:24, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Suggestions generated by an automatic JavaScript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.
You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas.
-(t) Josve05a (c) 23:28, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The two sections are looking good. Unfortunately I don't know enough about this topic to make informed advice, but I will try my best. Comments below:
Thanks for your edits during this course. In summary, this article reads quite well, but could be improved by ensuring that this article is more than a summary of the ILO's activities, and by making the language more accessible to lay Wikipedia readers. I hope this is helpful. Kind regards, --LT910001 (talk) 15:54, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]