This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because it has been GA-class for almost four years and I would like to know how to improve it so it can be ready for an FA nomination.
I'm doing a quick copy edit now. The article seems well written and comprehensive to me, and I don't believe it needs significant changes to pass FA, which is probably the next step to go through. Let me know when you nominate it so I can add my vote there. Lemurbaby (talk) 14:43, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Suggestions generated by an automatic JavaScript program[edit]
Suggestions generated by an automatic JavaScript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.
The script has spotted the following contractions: Can't, if these are outside of quotations, they should be expanded.