Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 Virginia  














Wikipedia:Peer review/Virginia/archive3







Add links
 









Project page
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 
















Appearance
   

 






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 

< Wikipedia:Peer review | Virginia

Previous peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
Virginia achieved Good Article status last year, but didn't receive a thorough line by line review. Two previous requests this year for Peer Review also went without any human review. Third time the charm? This article is quite close to FA, but where else does it need work? Where are more references needed? Which topic are too lengthy and which too short? How does it read? I think the article on a whole can be shortened, but which paragraphs can be broken off without damaging the readability? Even if someone could review a single section or subsection that would be an exemplar for the rest of the article. Thanks for your help, Patrick Ѻ 14:29, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

2 - paper needs to be italicized, date also needs to be linked.
12 - something wrong with the url format
13 - does nascar.com need to be italicized? Same thing with 14, 15, 19, 20.
21 - url is messed up, publisher is italicized. I don't think you need the publisher linked also.
31 - date needs to be linked
32 - Again, I don't think you need to externally link to the publisher.
40 - two periods after School
34, 43, 44 all look like the same source, they should be one single number, with the pages used all under one
Same with 46, 47

Overall I think this is a great article. Wide and detailed coverage that is an interesting read. Like I said above, you just need to do a little polishing. I highly recommend the WP:LoCE. They do good work on the little grammar and punctuation problems (which always trip me up). Work through these and let me know if you have any questions or need any help. Good work! KnightLago (talk) 18:44, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Peer_review/Virginia/archive3&oldid=203877176"

Category: 
April 2008 peer reviews
 



This page was last edited on 7 April 2008, at 00:40 (UTC).

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



Privacy policy

About Wikipedia

Disclaimers

Contact Wikipedia

Code of Conduct

Developers

Statistics

Cookie statement

Mobile view



Wikimedia Foundation
Powered by MediaWiki