The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retargettoUSA-215. Jay(talk) 09:04, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Deletion because this redirect is unused (zero pages link to it, zero recent visitors) and it's an odd-ball out of a list of hundreds of other potential redirects that follow the format "USA ###" where ### are numbers, so as part of a cleanup of that article, I'd like to have that deleted. Keavon (talk) 23:56, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The satellite has an article: USA-215. I haven't seen references without the hyphen so I think the redirect can be deleted. If it stays then it should obviously be retargeted. --mfb (talk) 14:46, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
RetargettoUSA-215 as a {{R from typo}}; if it becomes ambiguous, then you can turn it into a disambiguation page. As of now, it should just point to the article. -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 21:56, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. As an unopposed deletion nomination. Jay(talk) 18:50, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not mentioned at the target, briefly mentioned at a dozen or so other pages, which makes me think that deletion to allow for internal search results is most appropriate. signed, Rosguilltalk 18:07, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Don't see how this redirect is helpful/plausible. Someone is going to type either MisnomerorMisnomers to arrive at the article, not parentheses. Steel1943 (talk) 18:09, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as useful in links. Looks like only 1 mainspace link, but clearly someone finds it useful, and it is correctly targeted. Mdewman6 (talk) 23:23, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Mdewman6: I have gone and fixed that typo. Now, nothing points there. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 11:49, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As unlikely redirect. Monomers is sufficient for the plural form. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 11:46, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not a reasonable link target or search target. Like Steel said, someone is either going to type "monomer" or "monomers".--Srleffler (talk) 23:45, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Parenthetical plurals are quite common, used when a statement can refer to one or more of the noun in question, and here someone has created a redirect instead of using a piped link. The incoming link was not "a typo", in fact Zxcvbnm simply changed it to a piped link with the same displayed text. Redirects are not only search terms and I am not sure what is meant by "unlikely redirect". It is harmless, unambiguous, and potentially useful, and we do not delete redirects meeting those criteria. Mdewman6 (talk) 23:20, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hog FarmTalk 20:24, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep We gain nothing from deleting, and possibly harm someone's reading experience. Paradoctor (talk) 20:31, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay(talk) 10:54, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay(talk) 10:39, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:28, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Extremely obscure shortcut, even at the time it was discussed back in 2006 it was already a long-deprecated abbreviation for a long-deprecated term. WhatLinksHere shows it's entirely unused, and having random 3 letter redirects is an active hindrance to anyone searching for the correct projectspace page. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 03:44, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: This ought to have some minimum participation. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay(talk) 06:36, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as confusing at best --Lenticel(talk) 05:45, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, it's just confusing. --mfb (talk) 14:51, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Garcinia mangostana and Sphaeranthus indicus[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:38, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Propose that this should be retargeted to Estrous cycle#Four phases, where the more common spelling Estrum currently targets. Currently, this is a redirect for a misspelling of the target, but it doesn't seem very phonetically close such that it would be a valuable search term. Correct, alternative spellings should take precedence over misspellings. Mdewman6 (talk) 00:55, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguate. Oe is sometimes used for ö in English: there are sources (from the 19th century) that use this spelling [1][2]. However, there's also a place with the name of "Oestrum" in a different part of Germany: de:Oestrum. The phase in the estrous cycle could be a primary topic, but retargeting to Estrous_cycle#Estrus would entail placing a hatnote there, and I'm really not keen on having a major article getting interrupted in this way because of a redirect that only gets one view every couple of days. A disambiguation page at the base title will serve our readers best. – Uanfala (talk) 16:59, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguate. Writing "oe" for『ö』is the correct transliteration to the English alphabet. That replacement is done even in German when the umlaut can't be used. --mfb (talk) 14:58, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I have attempted a disambig draft at the redirect. Jay(talk) 15:12, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
→ Junipero Serra Boulevard (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 17#Emotional turmoil
