The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Makes sense to Delete. Unused redirect, previously with a comment that has now been moved to the talk page anyways. Aza24 (talk) 22:39, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep there are more than 20 thousand of these preserving the attribution for comments that were later subst'd onto talk pages as a result of a procedure developed following extensive community discussion, see WP:DCS. If deletion of these is goal to be pursued, and I have no idea why we'd want to do so, it should be through a more systematic method than nominating one arbitrary redirect for deletion. 74.73.224.126 (talk) 17:55, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Jay 💬 09:49, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure this is the best target for this redirect. Maybe dab, but I would like to see what others think of it. Interstellarity (talk) 20:51, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I'm not quite certain what else "Global history" would refer to. There is already a hatnote at the top for history of globalization, which I think is even a stretch. Estar8806 (talk) 21:05, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I seriously doubt that anyone searching global history is looking for a history of globalization. While that may be a more "correct" comparison considering there is an argument for the difference between "global history" and "world history", the average reader is not going to make that distinction and is probably going to assume the two terms are interchangeable.
Nonetheless, the hatnote exists for those who do make a distinction between the two and I believe that is sufficient. Estar8806 (talk) 02:45, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The current target is the most likely one. I agree with Estar8806 that the current hatnote is sufficient. - Presidentmantalk · contribs (Talkback) 13:48, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy keep. Evidently the nominator did not get the message the first time. Deletion here would break a ton of incoming links. And yeah, look at this. (non-admin closure)J947 † edits 22:19, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
I think that the spacing makes this an unlikely search term. I have had previous experiences that have indicated that R3 may or may not apply in this situation so this is why I'm bringing this here. Clovermoss🍀(talk) 06:52, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Keep Penis (animal) and delete Penides. No consensus for the others.. Jay 💬 08:57, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Peanus, Piener, and Penis (animal). These are cheap redirects, and it is easy to confirm that the first two are extant slang terms. The third is useful because a reader might well assume that the title, Penis, would refer to the human anatomy, and that looking for the animal version would require a disambiguator. No opinion on Penides. BD2412T 02:22, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
KeepPenis (animal) given that the target article has detailed info on the matter. --Lenticel(talk) 01:49, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
DeletePeanus as it is a vague misseplling for peanuts and a slang for penis according to my Google Search. --Lenticel(talk) 01:53, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
DeletePenides it seems to be an old English term for sugarcane syrup or molasses. --Lenticel(talk) 02:01, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Peanus and Penides and Keep Penis (animal) per Lenticel. No opinion on Piener, though it's worth noting that all mentions in English Wikipedia were typos for "Peiner" (of or relating to Peine, Germany). 59.149.117.119 (talk) 07:11, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. As an unopposed deletion nomination. Jay 💬 08:41, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 8#Cheery Littlebottom
