The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Besides the fact that there are some soap operas that may have had this many episodes, this number is mentioned nowhere in the target article. Steel1943 (talk) 23:07, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Besides the fact that there are some soap operas that have had an episode of this number, thus making this redirect ambiguous, it also seems that this redirect targeting this page is erroneous: The target page makes mention of a "604", but not a "6004". Steel1943 (talk) 23:06, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
This redirect should be deleted, because the target page has no information about it, and it would be better to keep this a redlink so we know which octanol isomers need pages. Michael7604 (talk) 00:44, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
inC8H18O it should be removed entirely, along with the other subtypes of octanol, just leaving the link to Octanol;
inOctanol it just redirects back to the same article, so it should be removed, as should the redlink 4-octanol (there are 89 isomers of octanol, so there's no reason to list these specific two as redlinks but not list the remaining 85);
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Suggesting deletion. The article was previously under this incorrect duplicated name. She is referred to as simply "Camille" in Estonian media. The duplicated name may have come from the discogs.com page linked in the article, possibly originating from someone entering "Camille" to both first name and surname fields somewhere. Unfortunately the error has spread to Wikipedias in various languages and at least one Eurovision Song Contest trivia fansite. Abc347834 (talk) 11:46, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: The page was at the original title for over 3.5 years. Thoughts? Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit14:27, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per {{R from move}} and the evidence that this name is in widespread use. Where and why the error originated is irrelevant, what matters is that someone could see this name being used and use it to search for information on Wikipedia. Thryduulf (talk) 20:45, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Also notified of this discussion at the talk of the target and creator's pages. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬19:05, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. (as a creator). In general, I usually tend to support deleting of misspelled or suspicious redirects. For me this is obvious infoclutter for enwiki database. But I have seen, that it is very hard to delete even obviously misspelled redirects--Estopedist1 (talk) 07:02, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment (from nominator). If there is no consensus to delete, a better alternative to keeping the redirect could be redirecting to the disambiguation page Camille, which includes the musician, and would also be a better situation in the (rather unlikely) case the duplicated name ever comes to use in some other context. Mats84 (talk) 17:26, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Excuse me, I've been having a bad practice of using two accounts interchangeably on different computers. This comment is indeed from me. I'll try to stick to a single account in the future. Abc347834 (talk) Abc347834 (talk) 20:03, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
I think anybody who would be looking up the IP would be doing so with the numbers instead of writing them out. I don't believe this to be a helpful or useful redirect. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:46, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per DefaultFree, and also because spelling out "one" doesn't seem too impossible to imagine; teeters between harmless and seemingly helpful. Utopes(talk / cont)21:49, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete it is a error I made when trying to replace "animal" with "gastropod", but it is not a typo somebody would make when trying to type "gastropod". Plantdrew (talk) 17:02, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete to encourage article creation. I'm surprised we don't have this, or even an index to the various lists of cartoon characters, but if we do I can't find it. Thryduulf (talk) 15:58, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
This is a list of users with an Aspergers userbox on their userpage. It's a fine category, but there doesn't seem to be a high need for a CAT PNR to frequently access it, one that's accessible in mainspace. CAT PNRs are more-or-less reserved for categories that have an understandable need for regular access, and where a shortcut might be useful for such categories. This list of userpages does not fit this bill, and should probably be removed for the sake of cleaning up the CAT space. If a link is needed to this category, WP:CATASPERGERorWP:ASPERGERCAT might be far more suitable project-space alternatives, as opposed to a CAT redirect which sits in a pseudo-namespace in the same location as articles. Utopes(talk / cont)09:47, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
A content category which has seemingly no need for a CAT PNR. Shortcuts work when they are adopted and used, and in this case, I can't really see a reason why the overarching parent-category for general fringe theories would need a CAT PNR to quickly navigate there. It was seemingly hand-waved there via a 2021 RfD, where it was decided that a category called "Fringe" would be most associated with fringe theory. Yet, such a category does not seem in need of a CAT PNR that artificially enforces this association, so it could be more appropriate to reserve this namespace for categories in need of higher maintenance. Utopes(talk / cont)09:31, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Looks to be a regular content category with very few articles in this top-level container. One of the few remaining CAT pages that don't really have a purpose, as its otherwise identically named to its category counterpart, and could not be intuitively understood that it's a thing that exists, without already knowing it's there. Utopes(talk / cont)09:15, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Points to a top-level category that currently contains 5 pages. From a cursory glance, it looks like 3 of such pages aren't supposed to be in this category and should be recategorized, which is a function I presume this PNR can be used with. However, there are next to no other CAT PNRs that are similar to this, as this doesn't seem to need frequent access that would warrant the need to have a PNR, as it's just a regular content category. Utopes(talk / cont)09:12, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
That seems to violate WP:PTM in some way, considering the word "culture" is nowhere in the title of the recommended disambiguation page. In addition, the recommended target contains terms like "atheism", which I cannot see having any connection to these redirects. Steel1943 (talk) 22:39, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
RetargettoSecular Jew, as this is where someone using these search terms will find links to whatever topic they are looking for. It is thus the most helpful target for readers, regardless of whether it meets the letter of any guidelines. Thryduulf (talk) 13:32, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
RetargettoSecular Jew, which contains the important bit of the first two words (Secular Jew), which in this context I feel have higher priority than the last two (Jewish culture). The disambig page gives the most options from that point. Utopes(talk / cont)06:16, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
This looks an old title of the page that was moved to a more neutral title. This is an exception to WP:RNEUTRAL, this is not an established term and unlikely to be useful so it fulfills the criteria D3. Tousif❯❯❯Talk04:14, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete. "Innovasjonspartiet" as would be the Norwegian name is not used anywhere. Well, I found a single hit, this piece describing the Innovation Party (Turkey). If it had to redirect somewhere it would have to be the Innovation and Technology Party. Geschichte (talk) 09:05, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Additional thoughts on potential alternative targets? Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit01:54, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 28#Episode 201
