Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 September 11  



1.1  Template:Mosques in Vietnam  





1.2  Template:Jamie Lawson  





1.3  Template:32TeamBracket-Compact-info  





1.4  Template:6TeamBracket-NPB  





1.5  Template:The 80 Greatest Redskins  





1.6  Template:Washington Commanders 90 Greatest  
















Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 September 11







Add links
 









Project page
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 
















Appearance
   

 






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion | Log

September 11[edit]

Template:Mosques in Vietnam[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relistedon2022 September 18. plicit 23:40, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Jamie Lawson[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:51, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NENAN, only three targets. Muhandes (talk) 20:22, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:32TeamBracket-Compact-info[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:50, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant to {{32TeamBracket-Info}}. – Pbrks (t • c) 15:53, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:6TeamBracket-NPB[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:54, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Color purely decorative and does not meet WCAG AAA standards. Replaced with {{6TeamBracket-info}}. – Pbrks (t • c) 01:57, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Every NPB template I've ever made is based on an MLB equivalent (in this case template:10TeamBracket-MLB) and without fail, all of the NPB templates are eventually deleted while the MLB ones are never touched. I do not understand it and it is incredibly frustrating. --TorsodogTalk 02:38, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Torsodog: I recently started a discussion over at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Baseball (as well as WikiProjects Football, NBA, and NFL) about their colored brackets. While WP:BASEBALL has not responded, at WT:NBA, they have agreed that the colors serve no purpose and should be removed. I intend on removing their colors if I do not receive a comment, and if it is reverted, I'll start an RfC, most likely. – Pbrks (t • c) 03:20, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 11:17, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. –Aidan721 (talk) 01:47, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:The 80 Greatest Redskins[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. (non-admin closure)Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 22:23, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:TFD#REASONS, "The template violates a policy such as Neutral point of view" - inclusion on this list appears to be subjective to the creator. See above reasoning for similar "90 greatest Commanders" list. OhNoitsJamie Talk 02:57, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

it's a list created by the team/franchise itself - https://www.commanders.com/team/history/80-greatest-redskins Diddykong1130 (talk) 03:19, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
See reply for Template:Washington Commanders 90 Greatest - if wikipedia stipulates that unique honors like this won't be reflected in templates then that decision should be made across all NFL teams. It doesn't makes sense that some NFL teams have unique templates while it's "arbitrary" for other NFL teams. Diddykong1130 (talk) 23:26, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 11:17, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Washington Commanders 90 Greatest[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. (non-admin closure)Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 22:22, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:TFD#REASONS, "The template violates a policy such as Neutral point of view" - inclusion on this list appears to be subjective to the creator. My mistake (per below). However, I'm still not sure if Wikipedia should be mirroring this via a template. It's not clear to the reader that this is based on a list that the franchise publishes, and it still seems somewhat arbitrary to have a list like this for one team. OhNoitsJamie Talk 02:57, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

it's a list created by the franchise - https://www.commanders.com/news/commanders-announce-inductees-to-greatest-players-list Diddykong1130 (talk) 03:17, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see how it's any different than other NFL teams having templates that are unique only to themselves. Look at Template:PatriotsAllDynasty, Template:Patriots2010s, Template:Patriots50th just as other examples of unique honors that a NFL team created for its former personnel/players Diddykong1130 (talk) 04:29, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I fail to see how it is "arbitrary" to keep when we have plenty of similar ones for other teams. I also fail to see how a reader is going to assume it's a fan list written up by a Wiki editor. ~ Dissident93 (talk) 13:11, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 11:16, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2022_September_11&oldid=1111031079"

Hidden category: 
Non-talk pages that are automatically signed
 



This page was last edited on 18 September 2022, at 23:40 (UTC).

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



Privacy policy

About Wikipedia

Disclaimers

Contact Wikipedia

Code of Conduct

Developers

Statistics

Cookie statement

Mobile view



Wikimedia Foundation
Powered by MediaWiki