Contents

Wikipedia:WikiProject Bible/Biblical criticism work group/Assessment

Biblical Criticism articles by quality and importance
Quality	Importance
	Top	High	Mid	Low	???	Total
FA				1		1
B		1	1			2
C	2		1	1	2	6
Start	8	3	2		10	23
Stub	3			1	4	8
Other			1	1		2
Assessed	13	4	5	4	16	42
Total	13	4	5	4	16	42

Welcome to the assessment department of the Biblical Criticism WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's articles on biblical criticism. The article ratings are used within the project to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Biblical Criticism}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:biblical criticism articles by quality and Category:biblical criticism articles by importance, which can then be seen in the #Current status section below.

How can I get an article rated?

Do it yourself or list it in the section for assessment requests below.

On what basis are assessments made?

Criteria for importance is described in #Importance scale. We have not established project-specific criteria for quality, so we use Template:Grading scheme and Template:Assessment Class Summary.

Who can assess articles?

Any Wikipedia contributor

Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments?

Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.

What if I don't agree with a rating?

Change it or discuss it in the article talk page.

Where are articles needing assessment?

AtCategory:Unassessed biblical criticism articles and in the #Requesting an assessment section below.

If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.

An article's importance assessment is generated from the criticism-importance parameter in the {{WikiProject Bible}} project banner on its talk page, like this:

{{WikiProject Bible|class=|importance=|criticism=yes|criticism-importance=}}

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new quality rating for it, please feel free to list it below. Note: This is only to rate the article on quality – you may or may not get feedback on the article. If you desire a review, use the peer review process. If you assess an article, please remove it so that other editors will not waste time reviewing the same articles. Thanks!

Edit this section and place request here:

• 11.8% List-Class
• 11.8% Stub-Class
• 23.5% Start-Class
• 52.9% C-Class

The following table is convenient for determining priority articles and overall project coverage, but is maintained by the WP_1.0_bot, which is poorly maintained and updates the table only unreliably.	Articles by Quality and Importance	The following are updated nearly immediately.
Biblical Criticism articles by quality and importance Quality Importance Top High Mid Low ??? Total FA 1 1 B 1 1 2 C 2 1 1 2 6 Start 8 3 2 10 23 Stub 3 1 4 8 Other 1 1 2 Assessed 13 4 5 4 16 42 Total 13 4 5 4 16 42	Biblical criticism articles Importance Refresh  Top   High   Mid   Low   ???  Total Quality  FA 0 0 0 0 0 0  A 0 0 0 0 0 0  GA 0 0 0 0 0 0 B 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 9 Start 0 0 0 0 0 4 Stub 0 0 0 0 0 2  FL 0 0 0 0 0 0 List 0 0 0 0 0 2 ??? 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 2 0 5 10 0 17	Top   High   Mid   Low   NA   ???  Total  2   0   5   10   3  0   20   FA  A  GA B C Start Stub  FL List Category Disambig File Portal Project Redirect Template NA ??? Total 0 0 0 0 9 4 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 20

This is a log of operations by a bot. The contents of this page are unlikely to need human editing. In particular, links should not be disambiguated as this is a historical record.

• Historical reliability of the Gospels (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-ClasstoC-Class (rev · t).

• L source (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t).

• Who Were the Early Israelites and Where Did They Come from? (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).

• Misquoting Jesus (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-ClasstoC-Class (rev · t).

• Greek primacy renamed to Language of the New Testament.

• David Strauss (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).
• Morton Smith (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).

• Alfred Loisy (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Top-Class (rev · t).

• James Hastings (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Top-Class (rev · t).

• Canonical criticism (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-ClasstoB-Class (rev · t).

• Eureka: An Exposition of the Apocalypse (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).

• Versification (Bible) renamed to Chapters and verses of the Bible.

• Greek Primacy renamed to Greek primacy.

• Greek primacy (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Mid-Class (rev · t).

• Judas (song) (talk) removed. Quality rating was B-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).

• Judas (song) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as B-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).

• Versification (Bible) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).

• Interpreter's Bible series (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).

• L source (talk) assessed. Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).

• List of Bible verses not included in modern translations (talk) removed. Quality rating was List-Class (rev · t).
• Reuel (name) (talk) removed. Quality rating was NA-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was NA-Class (rev · t).

• Raguel (name) renamed to Reuel (name).

• Reuel (name) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as NA-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as NA-Class (rev · t).

• Historicity of the canonical Gospels renamed to Historical reliability of the Gospels.

• Historical reliability of the Gospels (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Top-Class (rev · t).

• Criticism of the Bible (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from B-ClasstoC-Class (rev · t).

• The Skeptic's Annotated Bible (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Unknown-Class (rev · t).

• Ormulum (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as FA-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).

• Dennis MacDonald (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-ClasstoC-Class (rev · t).

• Authenticity of the canonical Gospels renamed to Historicity of the canonical Gospels.

• Historicity of the canonical Gospels (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Top-Class (rev · t).

• Historicity of the Gospels renamed to Authenticity of the canonical Gospels.

• Authenticity of the canonical Gospels (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Top-Class (rev · t).

• Psychological Biblical Criticism renamed to Psychological biblical criticism.

• Alexandrian school (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).
• Biblical criticism (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).
• Biblical literalism (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).
• Burton L. Mack (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).
• Canonical criticism (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Top-Class (rev · t).
• Criticism of the Bible (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).
• Dennis MacDonald (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).
• Deuteronomic Code (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as High-Class (rev · t).
• Eclecticism (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).
• Form criticism (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Top-Class (rev · t).
• Framework interpretation (Genesis) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).
• George H. Lang (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).
• Gleason Archer (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).
• Greek Primacy (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Mid-Class (rev · t).
• Historicity of the Gospels (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Top-Class (rev · t).
• James M. Robinson (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).
• Jesus Seminar (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Mid-Class (rev · t).
• John S. Kloppenborg (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).
• List of Bible verses not included in modern translations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Mid-Class (rev · t).
• Misquoting Jesus (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Mid-Class (rev · t).
• Narrative criticism (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Top-Class (rev · t).
• New Perspective on Paul (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as B-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Mid-Class (rev · t).
• Pentateuchal criticism (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as High-Class (rev · t).
• Psychological Biblical Criticism (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Top-Class (rev · t).
• Raguel (angel) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).
• Raguel (archangel) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).
• Raguel (name) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).
• Redaction criticism (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Top-Class (rev · t).
• Rhetorical criticism (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Top-Class (rev · t).
• Source criticism (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Top-Class (rev · t).
• Synoptic Gospels (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as High-Class (rev · t).
• Tetragrammaton in the New Testament (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Mid-Class (rev · t).
• Textual criticism (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as GA-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Top-Class (rev · t).
• The Skeptic's Annotated Bible (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).
• Tradition history (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Top-Class (rev · t).
• Typology (theology) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Top-Class (rev · t).
• Westar Institute (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).