Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 Frequently asked questions  





2 Instructions  



2.1  Quality scale  





2.2  Importance scale  







3 Requesting an assessment  





4 See also  














Wikipedia:WikiProject Gilbert and Sullivan/Assessment







Add links
 









Project page
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 
















Appearance
   

 






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 

< Wikipedia:WikiProject Gilbert and Sullivan

Welcome to the assessment department of the Gilbert and Sullivan WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's Gilbert and Sullivan and related articles. The article ratings are used within the project to aid in recognizing high-quality articles and identifying articles in need of further work.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{G&S-project}} talk page project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Gilbert and Sullivan articles by quality and Category:Gilbert and Sullivan articles by importance.

Frequently asked questions[edit]

How do I add an article to the WikiProject?
Just add {{G&S-project}} to the talk page; there's no need to do anything else.
How can I get my article rated?
Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
Who can assess articles?
Any member of the Gilbert and Sullivan WikiProject is free to add—or change—the rating of an article, up to B-class. Ratings of GAorFA are given through other Wikipedia processes.
What if I don't agree with a rating?
You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
Aren't the ratings subjective?
Yes, they are (see, in particular, the disclaimers on the importance scale), but it's the best system WP:1.0 have been able to devise.
How can I keep track of changes in article ratings?
Put the articles you are concerned about on your watch list.
What if I have a question not listed here?
If your question concerns the article assessment process specifically, please refer to the discussion page for this department; for any other issues, you can ask at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Gilbert and Sullivan, or contact one of the other members directly.

Instructions[edit]

An article's assessment is generated from the class and importance parameters in the {{G&S-project}} project banner on its talk page (see the project banner instructions for more details on the exact syntax):

{{G&S-project| ... | class=??? | importance=??? | ...}}

The following values may be used for the class parameter:

Articles for which a valid class is not provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Gilbert and Sullivan articles. The class should be assigned according to the quality scale below.

The following values may be used for the importance parameter:

The parameter is not used if an article's class is set to NA, and may be omitted in those cases. Articles for which a valid importance is not provided are listed in Category:Unknown-importance Gilbert and Sullivan articles. The importance should be assigned according to the importance scale below.

Quality scale[edit]

  • e
  • Importance scale[edit]

    The criteria used for rating article importance are not meant to be an absolute or canonical view of how significant the topic is. Rather, they attempt to gauge the probability of the average reader of Wikipedia needing to look up the topic (and thus the immediate need to have a suitably well-written article on it). Thus, subjects with greater popular notability may be rated higher than topics which are arguably more "important" but which are of interest primarily to students of literature.

    Article importance grading scheme
    Label Criteria Examples
    Top Subject is a "core" topic for anyone wanting to know about Gilbert and Sullivan. Any good encyclopedia should have an excellent article on this subject. Extremely high probability that non-G&S specialists will be looking at this article. Gilbert and Sullivan
    W. S. Gilbert
    Arthur Sullivan
    The Mikado
    High Subject is highly important in the G&S field, but somewhat less important to non-specialists. Iolanthe
    D'Oyly Carte Opera Company
    Rutland Barrington
    Mid Subject is notable or significant within the broad G&S community, but not particularly well known or important outside of it. The Grand Duke
    The Rose of Persia
    Peter Pratt
    Low Subject is of importance only to G&S specialists. The Sapphire Necklace
    Princess Toto
    Nellie Briercliffe

    Requesting an assessment[edit]

    Requests for assessments can be placed here.


    See also[edit]

    WikiProject Council Assessment FAQ


    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Gilbert_and_Sullivan/Assessment&oldid=252494695"

    Categories: 
    WikiProject Gilbert and Sullivan
    WikiProject assessments
     



    This page was last edited on 18 November 2008, at 02:55 (UTC).

    Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



    Privacy policy

    About Wikipedia

    Disclaimers

    Contact Wikipedia

    Code of Conduct

    Developers

    Statistics

    Cookie statement

    Mobile view



    Wikimedia Foundation
    Powered by MediaWiki