The peer review department conducts peer reviews of articles upon request. Its purpose is to encourage better articles by having contributors collaborate and provide ideas on further improvement. This can also be used for an in-project review before nominating an article for featured article status.
Trigonella suavissima I am a university student currently working on a wikipedia page editing project. Although an image of the species is still missing, I have added as much contents as I could. May I kindly request an assessment on my article? Thank you!--What7IWrote (talk) 02:32, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Fontainea venosa: I have added some information to further improve the article as a part of my university project. The goal is to improve it to a C or B class. All constructive feedback or further information additions would be highly appreciated. Thank you so much! Sparklingkull (talk) 01:12, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ficinia nodosa: I am making additions to this page for a university project and would like feedback on the additions I have made as well as future additions I could make. Thanks. --Nagware (talk) 04:25, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Leaf spot: The article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale. I have added more information to the sections since the upgrade from stub to C-Class and would like to request for a review/ revision of the class. Thankyou. --Savina Jo (talk) 03:42, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Inflorescence: It is listed as high importance and has changed so much recently, I'd like to get the most possible opinions because I'd like to see it B-rated (then possibly pass the GA nomination sooner or later) and because I had many doubts I'd like to solve when I chose to organise it that way. It would be very useful if I could get some opinions on the questions I put on the article's discussion. I'd like its accuracy to be checked by some experts, too (it was prised -private email- by a professional botanist from the SIUC, so I suppose it must have no major problems). So I request for an in-project peer review. Thank you Aelwyn16:07, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please could someone comment on whether there are other aspects of this genus which should be included?
I have not at present included any notes on cultivars as I am only familiar with ones available in the UK and as there are very few accurate descriptions by those who named the individual cultivars, there is much mis-labelling & mis-identifcation.
Saxifraga (talk) 20:16, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Fabaceae (No description, we need a picture to describe the flower of Faboideae -I could take it if it wasn't winter!-; Papilionaceae redirects to Fabaceae, shouldn't it redirect to Faboidea?)
