Welcome to the assessment departmentofWikiProject Schools! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's School articles. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work. Ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Schools}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories.
Any member of the Schools WikiProject is free to add—or change—the rating of an article. However, please review WP:COI before rating an article you are heavily involved in.
What if I don't agree with a rating?
You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
Aren't the ratings subjective?
Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!
If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.
An article's assessment is generated from the class and importance parameters in the {{WikiProject Schools}} project banner on its talk page:
{{WikiProject Schools|class=|importance=}}
If the article already has an infobox, add the line: needs-infobox=no. By adding "info=<text of assessment>" this template will generates a boilerplate assessment text.
Tag an article related to this project (or look at a tagged article).
Read the article and analyze it.
Place your assessment in the {{WikiProject Schools}} banner on the articles talk page (according to the scales below).
Unless the reasoning for an assessment is self-evident, such as assessing a very short article as Stub-class and Low-importance, please place a summary of your assessment on the article's talk page. This should include a rationale for your choice of ratings, and possibly suggestions for future contributors on how to improve the article's quality rating. If the assessment is likely to be controversial you may wish to leave a note about it on the main project talk page.
An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WikiProject Schools}} project banner on its talk page: {{WikiProject Schools|class=???}}
The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Content assessment for assessment criteria):
Note: You should not assign any GA, A, FA or FL grades arbitrarily. These grades must pass through official Wikipedia channels and undergo a peer review process.
Afeatured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes.
It is:
well-written: its prose is engaging and of a professional standard;
comprehensive: it neglects no major facts or details and places the subject in context;
well-researched: it is a thorough and representative survey of the relevant literature; claims are verifiable against high-quality reliable sources and are supported by inline citations where appropriate;
stable: it is not subject to ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured article process; and
a lead: a concise lead section that summarizes the topic and prepares the reader for the detail in the subsequent sections;
appropriate structure: a substantial but not overwhelming system of hierarchical section headings; and
consistent citations: where required by criterion 1c, consistently formatted inline citations using footnotes—see citing sources for suggestions on formatting references. Citation templates are not required.
Length. It stays focused on the main topic without going into unnecessary detail and uses summary style where appropriate.
Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information.
No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible.
The article is well organized and is essentially complete, having been reviewed by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere, as described here.
Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in Wikipedia:Article development. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a featured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. WikiProject Military history).
Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject matter would typically find nothing wanting.
Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style issues may need addressing. Peer-review may help.
it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;
reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose);
Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (although not equalling) the quality of a professional encyclopedia.
Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing.
The article is mostly complete and without major issues, but requires some further work to reach Good Article standards. B-Class articles should meet the six B-Class criteria:
The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for an A-Class article, although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing.
The article has a defined structure. Content should be organized into groups of related material, including a lead section and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind.
The article is reasonably well-written. The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but does not need to be of the standard of featured articles. The Manual of Style does not need to be followed rigorously.
The article contains supporting materials where appropriate. Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams, an infobox etc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content.
No reader should be left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher.
A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed, and expert knowledge is increasingly needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should also be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the manual of style.
The article is substantial, but is still missing important content or contains a lot of irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant issues or require substantial cleanup.
More detailed criteria
The article is better developed in style, structure and quality than Start-Class, but fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements; need editing for clarity, balance or flow; or contain policy violations such as biasortrivia. Articles on fictional topics are likely to be marked as C-Class if they are written from an in-universe perspective.
Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study.
Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and address cleanup issues.
An article that is developing, but which is quite incomplete and, most notably, lacks adequate reliable sources.
More detailed criteria
The article has a usable amount of good content, but it is weak in many areas, usually in referencing. Quality of the prose may be distinctly unencyclopedic, and MoS compliance non-existent; but the article should satisfy fundamental content policies such as notability and BLP, and provide enough sources to establish verifiability. No Start-Class article should be in any danger of being speedily deleted.
Provides some meaningful content, but the majority of readers will need more.
Provision of references to reliable sources should be prioritised; the article will also need substantial improvements in content and organisation.
The article is either a very short article or a rough collection of information that will need much work to become a meaningful article. It is usually very short, but can be of any length if the material is irrelevant or incomprehensible.
Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition
Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority.
Prose. It features professional standards of writing.
Lead. It has an engaging lead that introduces the subject and defines the scope and inclusion criteria.
Comprehensiveness.
(a) It comprehensively covers the defined scope, providing at least all of the major items and, where practical, a complete set of items; where appropriate, it has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about the items.
(c) In length and/or topic, it meets all of the requirements for stand-alone lists; does not violate the content-forking guideline, does not largely duplicate material from another article, and could not reasonably be included as part of a related article.
Structure. It is easy to navigate and includes, where helpful, section headings and table sort facilities.
Style. It complies with the Manual of Style and its supplementary pages.
(a) Visual appeal. It makes suitable use of text layout, formatting, tables, and colour; and a minimal proportion of items are redlinked.
Stability. It is not the subject of ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured list process.
Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items.
No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available.
Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area.
There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader.
Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized.
School articles are rated on this importance scale. Importance must be regarded as a relative term. If importance values are applied within this project, these only reflect the perceived importance to this project and to the work groups the School falls under. An article judged to be "Top-Class" in one context may be only "Mid-Class" in another project. The criteria used for rating article priority are not meant to be an absolute or canonical view of how significant the topic is. Rather, they attempt to gauge the probability of the average reader of Wikipedia needing to look up the topic (and thus the immediate need to have a suitably well-written article on it). Importance assessments, especially of schools in the higher categories, are frequently reassessed and may go up or down in order to retain an appropriate balance within each country and within all the categories. Assessors are not experts on the schools in every country of the world, and will only make assessments based on the content of the existing article. Assessors can also check viewing stats for school articles using the Wikipedia stats tool, though stats will only be used in combination with other factors.
NA - Non-article, adds to Category:NA-importance school articles. All categories, disambiguation pages, files, portals, project pages, and templates should be given this value.
Assessments should not, in general, leave this field blank. This guide acts as a general standard by which to measure WikiProject Schools articles
Top-importance - It is expected that at least one article from each country should be in this category. Countries with higher populations will necessarily have more schools of top-importance. Top importance schools will usually have a long list of notable international alumni or important national alumni (e.g., prime ministers, presidents, senior royalty, Nobel prize winners). They will often have received substantial national or international media coverage as evidenced by inclusion in TV programmes, books, e.t.c. They will be the most notable schools in their particular country, and they are also likely to have articles in foreign-language Wikis.
High-importance - Such schools will usually have a long list of notable alumni. They are often amongst the oldest or highest performing schools in their particular country. They will have received substantial media coverage and multiple sources will be available to aid the expansion of the article. Schools which feature in other encyclopedias such as Microsoft EncartaorEncylopedia Britannica are included in this category if they are not already of top importance.
Mid-importance - Such schools will have a few elements of more general national interest (e.g. a few particularly noteworthy and important alumni or significant awards).
Low-importance - Low importance schools are of vital interest to their communities but have no national or international recognition or importance. Nearly all primary/elementary schools and middle schools will fall into this category, as will the majority of high/secondary schools.
??? - This is the default setting and should also be used for articles which have been assessed but have not had their importance established.
School ages are considered in relative terms within countries. For example a school founded in the eighteenth century is often young in European terms. For further reference see:
If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below. If you assess an article, please strike it off using <s>Strike-through text</s> so that other editors will not waste time going there too. Old and fulfilled requests are periodically removed from the list.
Please note:
Only a small group of editors watch this list, and as a result, response times to assessment requests can vary from instant to over a week.
If you aim for an article to be promoted to GA, A, or FA class, please consider requesting a peer review as well, so the article can be exposed to closer scrutiny from a broader group of editors.
Add requests to the bottom of this list, please also sign your request by adding four tildes (~~~~):
Knox Academy - I've done some work to improve referencing/tone/content (and added an infobox), taking into account some important historical context and some recent events that were widely covered in the media. August 4th, 2019. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.73.150.97 (talk)
Elizabeth College, Guernsey - This has been a GA nominee for some time, but I think (and correct me if this isn't the correct use of this page) it should at least be reviewed by some Project Schools editors to reassess its status. It's currently a C-class article, but since that rating was assigned, I have done a large amount of work on the article. Formulaonewiki 17:40, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
*Hillel Day School - it used to be a redirect to locality, I just did a major rewrite. The talk page still shows "This article has been rated as Redirect-Class". I appreciate someone to assess the article. Will welcome your suggestions. Best regards, Yymmff (talk) 02:29, 20 November 2019 (UTC)Y Done by RogueScholar on 22 November 2019. Yamfri (talk) 20:26, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
*Edmund Burke School - page has been expanded and rewritten, a new assessment would be appreciated Bleubsdorf (talk) 10:55, 2 July 2020 (UTC) Change to Start.YDone[reply]
The Vanguard School (Colorado) - I rewrote the article and I feel it needs a reassessment. It can't possibly still be stub-class after this, right? Y Done-ClemRutter (talk) 10:10, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Iceland School of Energy - New to editing, and trying to update the Wikipedia for my school. Upon doing so it was flagged for having a COI. Can someone please review it, and provide feedback? Thank you. LaurentiuAnton (talk) 12:56, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Geracruzcolusa (talk) 06:38, 4 September 2020 (UTC) Y Done- for the moment. Interested in an thoughts on the standard I used.ClemRutter (talk) 15:02, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Reedsburg Area High School - Has been significantly expanded on by several editors, and I would like an outside perspective on the current status of this article. Thanks. JackFromReedsburg (talk) 21:50, 11 October 2020 (UTC) Y Done-ClemRutter (talk) 10:58, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Could the assessing editor(s) also advise on whether that title is appropriate or whether List of schools in Isfahan would be better? Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 18:59, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
HiC.Fred, I have moved this back to draft following the cut-and-paste move to a different title, circumventing the AFC process. As for title, "List of schools in" would be the appropriate format, which follows the other list pages. Steven (Editor) (talk) 20:52, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Forest Hills Eastern High School has been revamped and had a significant amount of information added to it so I would like for it to be reassesed. I'm a bit new to the wikipedia process/standards for articles so if someone could please go through it and leave some suggestions as well as helping identify COI issues it would be greatly appreciated. --Sirryan2002 (talk) 17:00, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Bishop Ramsey School Almost quintupled in size -78.147.232.155 (talk) 18:25, 15 June 2021 (UTC) I've removed the additions, which were a copy/paste from the school's website; as it stands the article appears to be correctly assessed. Wham2001 (talk) 20:21, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hathaway Academy has been completely overhauled and I have added history, a headteachers list and some other things. I would greatly appreciate a reassessment as the article is clearly no longer Stub Class and has been expanded significantly since its previous assessment made over 12 years ago. ThatRandomGuy1 (talk) 01:32, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
John Dewey Academy of Learning has been completely overhauled several times throughout the years (mostly by me), and has been something of a passion project. I've worked especially hard recently to revamp the page, and add photos and data that I've acquired over the years. I would really appreciate a review, as I think it's moved a bit past stub! Foxtrot620 (talk) 08:06, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Atlantic College Last assessed almost a decade ago, and the article has been significantly added to and improved since then. Would appreciate a re-assessment, and any suggestions on how to further improve the page. Dotx3 (talk) 00:00, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, you've done some good work, but restoring contested content that has been removed is not a good idea. Neither is ignoring the copyvio warning about this page on your talk page. We cannot host material form the school's copyrighted page. Meters (talk) 08:17, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Merewether High School Significantly expanded the article, particularly the lede, and curriculum section. I intend to expand the article further in the future, but I believe the present article has satisfied enough criteria to be upgraded to at least a C-level article. ZCJigglypuff (talk) 02:31, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Princeton Day School - Given some fairly substantial issues that have yet to be addressed, I feel the article would be more accurately listed as C-Class. –Noahfgodard (talk) 01:00, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Box Hill School - I believe this article was last reviewed in 2007, and was graded as low importance and stub quality. I believe neither of these assessments to be accurate today. I have personally largely extended this article, though since its last review it had been already significantly edited by others. Though there is still more to be done I believe it to be in need of a review. Many thanks, Grosseteste (talk) 12:59, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
William Blount High School - I do not believe this article has been previously reviewed by this project. I have substantially expanded it, and I think it is ready for review. Thank you in advance for your time and assistance. Scutarius 17:17, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Charterhouse School - I have made some alterations to the article but I would like to know what needs to be improved. I am very new and am trying to improve my school’s article to a GA rating, so any advice would be greatly appreciated. Thank you very much.
Do NOT edit your own school, Not only is it a conflict of interest, but can be dangerous to you, who knows who might want to do harm to you, by editing your own school you are putting yourself in danger. 😎😎PaulGamerBoy360😎😎 (talk) 21:35, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Wallace Hall (Thornhill) - This article has been extensively rewritten over the past few months, as well as hugely expanded with all necessary references. Another assessment would be greatly appreciated. Thank you! Kalumbus (talk) 18:24, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The Derryfield School - This article has been extensively expanded, and its current stub-class assessment was automatically added. Another assessment would be appreciated. That334 (talk) 16:33, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✅Done: Now Start Class, with more sources it would easily become a C-Class Article. I Would Suggest: School Digger, US News & World Report (Education), NCES, Great-Schools, & Niche. 😎😎PaulGamerBoy360😎😎 (talk) 14:46, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Up until February 2010 assessment summaries were placed in this section. However, to make assessing articles easier this practice has ended with old assessments now archived. At present assessments should be placed on the respective article's talk page (see #Process).
FA
A
GA
Y Done by RogueScholar on 22 November 2019. Yamfri (talk) 20:26, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
