J u m p t o c o n t e n t
M a i n m e n u
M a i n m e n u
N a v i g a t i o n
● M a i n p a g e
● C o n t e n t s
● C u r r e n t e v e n t s
● R a n d o m a r t i c l e
● A b o u t W i k i p e d i a
● C o n t a c t u s
● D o n a t e
C o n t r i b u t e
● H e l p
● L e a r n t o e d i t
● C o m m u n i t y p o r t a l
● R e c e n t c h a n g e s
● U p l o a d f i l e
S e a r c h
Search
A p p e a r a n c e
● C r e a t e a c c o u n t
● L o g i n
P e r s o n a l t o o l s
● C r e a t e a c c o u n t
● L o g i n
P a g e s f o r l o g g e d o u t e d i t o r s l e a r n m o r e
● C o n t r i b u t i o n s
● T a l k
W i k i p e d i a : W i k i L o v e s W o m e n / W r i t i n g C o n t e s t / J u r y
1 l a n g u a g e
● F r a n ç a i s
E d i t l i n k s
● P r o j e c t p a g e
● T a l k
E n g l i s h
● R e a d
● E d i t
● V i e w h i s t o r y
T o o l s
T o o l s
A c t i o n s
● R e a d
● E d i t
● V i e w h i s t o r y
G e n e r a l
● W h a t l i n k s h e r e
● R e l a t e d c h a n g e s
● U p l o a d f i l e
● S p e c i a l p a g e s
● P e r m a n e n t l i n k
● P a g e i n f o r m a t i o n
● G e t s h o r t e n e d U R L
● D o w n l o a d Q R c o d e
● W i k i d a t a i t e m
P r i n t / e x p o r t
● D o w n l o a d a s P D F
● P r i n t a b l e v e r s i o n
A p p e a r a n c e
F r o m W i k i p e d i a , t h e f r e e e n c y c l o p e d i a
< W i k i p e d i a : W i k i L o v e s W o m e n | W r i t i n g C o n t e s t
List of jury members
[ edit ]
If you want to join the jury, please drop a message on the project talk page
Important criteria for jurors to consider when selecting the winners
[ edit ]
Each jury member has total freedom to rate the entered articles according to their own criteria. However, each jury member may, if she so wishes, list the criteria that was important to her when selecting which article should be commended and why. Below are examples of important criteria that could be suggested by the jury.
Best Article
Contribution of the content (richness and accuracy of information, clarity, boldness, neutrality)
Presentation and wikification
Illustration (quality and variety of selected illustrations)
Spelling, grammar, typography, style
Importance of the subject
Work Related (other Wikimedia projects)
Accessibility
Best Team
Teamwork (assistance, collaboration, distribution of tasks, dialogue)
Work Related (working across other Wikimedia projects)
Choice of theme
Respect for the rules and the spirit of Wikipedia
R e t r i e v e d f r o m " https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Wiki_Loves_Women/Writing_Contest/Jury&oldid=702083812 "
C a t e g o r y :
● W i k i p e d i a : W i k i L o v e s W o m e n
● T h i s p a g e w a s l a s t e d i t e d o n 2 8 J a n u a r y 2 0 1 6 , a t 0 9 : 3 1 ( U T C ) .
● T e x t i s a v a i l a b l e u n d e r t h e C r e a t i v e C o m m o n s A t t r i b u t i o n - S h a r e A l i k e L i c e n s e 4 . 0 ;
a d d i t i o n a l t e r m s m a y a p p l y . B y u s i n g t h i s s i t e , y o u a g r e e t o t h e T e r m s o f U s e a n d P r i v a c y P o l i c y . W i k i p e d i a ® i s a r e g i s t e r e d t r a d e m a r k o f t h e W i k i m e d i a F o u n d a t i o n , I n c . , a n o n - p r o f i t o r g a n i z a t i o n .
● P r i v a c y p o l i c y
● A b o u t W i k i p e d i a
● D i s c l a i m e r s
● C o n t a c t W i k i p e d i a
● C o d e o f C o n d u c t
● D e v e l o p e r s
● S t a t i s t i c s
● C o o k i e s t a t e m e n t
● M o b i l e v i e w