Share this
Twitter
LinkedIn
Reddit
DiggThe Wikimedia Foundation is moving closer to a decision on whether to switch licenses for projects that use the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL), including English Wikipedia. Deputy Director Erik Möller is currently forming a volunteer committee to help communicate the details of the proposal to the many editing communities and to organize a vote on it. If the proposal passes, the committee will also assist in implementing the shift to the Creative Commons-Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 license. Switching to that Creative Commons license, which is similar in spirit to the GFDL, is an option that was added to the GFDL 1.3 (an update released in November 2008), after a long period of negotiation among the WMF, Creative Commons, and the Free Software Foundation (which is responsible for the GFDL).
Draft language for the potential new terms of use has also been posted on the licensing update proposal page, and the Foundation seeks feedback to make sure the language is clear and acceptable to the community. A vote open to editors from all affected projects is expected to take place in the coming weeks, before the Foundation makes a final decision on whether to switch licenses. The GFDL 1.3 requires that any such switch take place before 1 November, 2009.
On 6 March, Möller announced the results of a survey on the preferred method of attributing collaboratively-produced content when it is re-used by others. The most popular of six options was attribution by linking to the original article.
The results from the Wikinews Picture of the Year 2008 contest are in. The winner is a photograph by Lex Kolychev of a campaign event for independent candidates in the United States presidential election of 2008. It appeared on the Wikinews front page in the "News in pictures" section, which—as in the case of the winning image—occasionally features newsworthy photography even without a related published Wikinews article.
A fractious debate on Wikimedia Commons concluded this week over whether to delete an offensive political cartoonbyCarlos Latuff. That particular cartoon, which depicts Alan Dershowitz masturbating while watching violence in Beirut, is one of many cartoons the controversial Brazilian artist has released as public domain.
The Commons debate centered on whether the image has any educational value—and thus falls within the project scope—as well as whether it falls afoul of the Commons policy prohibiting "Files apparently created and/or uploaded for the purpose of vandalism or attack". Commons hosts many other images by Latuff, some of which have also been the subject of recent deletion debates. The debate over the Dershowitz cartoon was closed as "delete", which set off a short wheel war in which the image cycled through deletion and undeletion, with five different administrators involved.
The larger issue of how to interpret the scope of the Wikimedia Commons project remains largely unresolved, particularly regarding the requirement that files "must be realistically useful for an educational purpose".
On 12 March, WikiProject Missing encyclopedic articles completed the notable films list. This list, created by Reflex Reaction in 2005, originally included 1,914 movies compiled from various third-party lists which did not have articles on Wikipedia. The final movie removed from the list was Death of a Salesman (1951 film) which was created by Scapler.
In addition to the many missing notable films that were not included on that list, there remain to be written thousands of missing articles on dozens of other topical lists maintained by WikiProject Missing encyclopedic articles.
The immediate goal of the licensing committee is to aid in communicating what is going on and to help in organizing the vote (e.g. by setting up the necessary descriptions and translations). Only if the transition is approved (late April at the soonest) would the committee then switch over to helping make the relevant changes. Dragons flight (talk) 00:55, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
+ Add a comment
Discuss this story