Contents

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Volcanoes

This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Volcanoes and anything related to its purposes and tasks.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Shortcut WT:VOLC

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5Auto-archiving period: 120 days

Volcanoes: Canada Project‑class

This page is within the scope of WikiProject Volcanoes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of volcanoes, volcanology, igneous petrology, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VolcanoesWikipedia:WikiProject VolcanoesTemplate:WikiProject VolcanoesWikiProject Volcanoes articles Project This page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. This page is supported by the Volcanism of Canada task force.

WikiProject Volcanoes was featured in a WikiProject Report in the Signpost on 4 October 2010.

	WikiProject Volcanoes
Main page talk Archives: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 Departments Assessment talk Bibliography talk Categorization talk Category talk History talk Images talk Members talk Join talk Welcome talk Portal talk Articles Featured work talk Open tasks talk Popular pages talk

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2014/01/140130-kawah-ijen-blue-flame-volcanoes-sulfur-indonesia-pictures/

There are lots of these magmatic intrusions (that means volcanoes and igneous landforms) that need to be drafted and added to Wikipedia. In Lassen Volcanic National Park, I know we've got Lassen Peak, Chaos Crags, Mount Tehama, and a few other volcanoes in the area are Wikipedia-documented, but there are several cool volcanoes in the area, including stratovolcanoes, that need to be added. Like Latour Butte, Mount Harkness, Hat Mountain, several prominent peaks, Inskip Hill, Freaner Peak, and several other volcanoes across North America need to be added ASAP! Sorry if I sound in a rush, I just want Wikipedia to be even better than it currently is! Volcano]]User talk:TheEarlyVolcanologist2023 12 April 2023

Sakurajima has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 01:27, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Please note that Antarctic, which is within this project's scope, has been selected as one of the Articles for improvement. The article is scheduled to appear on Wikipedia's Community portal in the "Articles for improvement" section for one week, beginning today. Everyone is encouraged to collaborate to improve the article. Thanks, and happy editing! Delivered by — MusikBot talk 00:05, 15 April 2024 (UTC) on behalf of the AFI team[reply]

Please look at the page: Nodoroc

I am a geologist with the University of Georgua AND part of the family that owns the Nodoroc site. Whoever created this wiki entry is posting factually false information. This is a peat bog NOT a mud volcanon or volcano of any kind. Based on some of the references, I believe I know who might be responsible. He has let it be k iw to me before that he objects to professionals on the basis that we are professionals. Richard Thornton us widely a discredited name in the archeology field and he is in no way a geologist. I really don't have time to edit this whole site. It needs to be deleted. Please advise. GAgeologist (talk) 17:20, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MallardTV, as the creator of the mentioned article, do you have anything to say to this? Volcanoguy 17:43, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dang it. I didn’t know. I’d assume that my sources are too misinformed. MallardTV (talk) 17:49, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am in no way associated with anyone whom you may assume responsible. I am merely an interested person that frequents Winder. I didn’t know this was factually incorrect and agree it should indeed be taken down. MallardTV (talk) 17:52, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Or if it would be appropriate since you did start the page, perhaps we could cooperate to edit the existing stem to make an informative page. It actually is a very important geological and cultural site, just not a volcano. 0 2600:1005:B0CE:C9DE:0:A:451F:1701 (talk) 22:21, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]