●Stories
●Firehose
●All
●Popular
●Polls
●Software
●Thought Leadership
Submit
●
Login
●or
●
Sign up
●Topics:
●Devices
●Build
●Entertainment
●Technology
●Open Source
●Science
●YRO
●Follow us:
●RSS
●Facebook
●LinkedIn
●Twitter
●
Youtube
●
Mastodon
●Bluesky
Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!
Forgot your password?
Close
wnewsdaystalestupid
sightfulinterestingmaybe
cflamebaittrollredundantoverrated
vefunnyunderrated
podupeerror
×
11672742
story
Posted
by
Soulskill
April 22, 2010 @05:17AM
from the come-on-valve-spill-the-beans dept.
SheeEttin writes "Back in November 2008, Phoronix reported that Linux libraries appeared in the Left 4 Dead demo, and then in March, Valve announced that Steam and the Source engine were coming to Mac OS X. Now, Phoronix reports that launcher scripts included with the (closed beta) Mac version of Steam include explicit support for launching a Linux version."
Related Links
Red Hat Releases RHEL 6 Public Beta 1
Treasury Goes High-Tech With Redesigned $100 Bills
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
Load All Comments
Full
Abbreviated
Hidden
/Sea
Score:
5
4
3
2
1
0
-1
More
Login
Forgot your password?
Close
Close
Log In/Create an Account
●
All
●
Insightful
●
Informative
●
Interesting
●
Funny
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
byL4t3r4lu5 ( 1216702 ) writes:
This is an indication of support for the Steam distribution platform, and some Valve games on Linux. Good luck getting EA to build Linux binaries for their games, because Steam doesn't do that for you.
Good on Valve for going this way, and maybe it's the push big publishers need to start telling devs to create native Linux binaries, but don't think for a moment that that this means all Steam games will run natively on Linux.
twitter
facebook
byJazzbunny ( 1251002 ) writes:
Well EA already pledged support for MeeGo platform so it's not that far fetched idea.
bysznupi ( 719324 ) writes:
OTOH what Steam could provide is keeping known versions of Linux libs (hey, that includes Winelib ;) ), making things much simpler. With the amount of control Valve perhaps has...who knows, perhaps many games ("simpler" ones at the beginning) could be semi-automatically adapted to included version of Wine, too.
Parent
twitter
facebook
byTechman83 ( 949264 ) writes:
It's not really that far fetched, Picasa is one example and there are many other applications that come prepackaged with wine.
byL4t3r4lu5 ( 1216702 ) writes:
I run WoW in WINE, and with very reasonable results (I get some visual artefacts, but only single frames of some incorrect polygon shapes). If Valve were working on bundling custom WINE launchers for each game... That might work.
byYvanhoe ( 564877 ) writes:
Yeah. I'll keep my system open, thank you very much.
byT Murphy ( 1054674 ) writes:
Good luck getting EA to build Linux binaries for their games
No duh. Everyone knows malware won't run on Linux.
Parent
twitter
facebook
byPopeRatzo ( 965947 ) * writes:
Everyone knows malware won't run on Linux.
Oh, it'll run, but you've got to give it permission.
byh00manist ( 800926 ) writes:
Everyone knows malware won't run on Linux.
Oh, it'll run, but you've got to give it permission.
No, it's because the malware programmers have little motivation to create software for the 1% of computers that have more qualified admins. If linux reaches 99% of users, suddenly it will have all kinds of software for it which run very well, hordes of people looking for exploits, etc - malware. MacOS is getting more popular, soon it will start having trouble, I'm sure. Market shares are at http://marketshare.hitslink.com/os-market-share.aspx?qprid=9 [hitslink.com]
byedmicman ( 830206 ) writes:
sudo BanzaiBuddy
See, it works!
byLumpy ( 12016 ) writes:
Because the journalists that coined the phrase were too stupid to know what it meant?
This term came from the same bunch of idiots that gave us "blogging" and "blogosphere" "web 2.0" and "podcasting" that we are now forever stuck with because they are trendy and catchy...
Rooting a box means gaining control of the root account. rootkits were typically a kit of tools you used to root a box, to get that root password or escalate your login to root privileges. . What we see as rootkits today are NOT rootkits. They are simply malware that used a bug to get in and run and then they hide themselves. Something that is NOT NEW and has been running around in computing for a very long time.
Parent
twitter
facebook
bysomersault ( 912633 ) writes:
Read his first sentence again a few times.
bytepples ( 727027 ) writes:
Yes, but to get root access... That's not a Windows term, is it. Root is the Admin account on Unix-style systems
"Administrators groupkit" isn't as catchy.
byDrXym ( 126579 ) writes:
This is an indication of support for the Steam distribution platform, and some Valve games on Linux. Good luck getting EA to build Linux binaries for their games, because Steam doesn't do that for you.
I don't see why it couldn't. They could licence and bundle one of the Wine libs that exist for running Windows games on Linux and Mac and make the experience completely transparent to the end user. Games would have to be tested & certified of course, but other than that it wouldn't require EA or anyone e
byEnderandrew ( 866215 ) writes:
You don't need to license Wine as it is freely available for redistribution under the GPL. When Sierra/Vivendi re-released many of their classic adventure games, they came bundled with Dosbox to make the games work. They didn't have to license Dosbox, as it is GPL. They could simply redistribute it.
bySycraft-fu ( 314770 ) writes:
Ya that's the real problem. I mean while Steam and Impulse and so on are cool, currently they are not the be-all, end-all in games, or even the biggest sales channel. Retail is still where the most games are sold. So it isn't like the problem with games on Linux was that the distribution channel was closed to Linux, though the games could be available. The problem is that the games themselves aren't being ported to Linux.
While Steam on Linux certainly wouldn't hurt Linux gaming, I'm unconvinced it would rea
byMZeora ( 1707054 ) writes:
Funny story - true story. You buy the retail box, then upload the Key to Steam and download and install that way. So really once Steam gets some proper Linux support for their games (through testing as mentioned by others by the various means)
As a full time Linux user. I for one welcome the advance of having Steam run on Linux. Since that'll take from the fan boys of not having the gaming abilities. Linux CAN in fact be a all purpose desktop. Just because it's naturally born as a Server OS doesn't mean i
bysgtrock ( 191182 ) writes:
Just because it's naturally born as a Server OS doesn't mean it can't be brought to the masses at large, just like everything else it takes time.
You do know that Linux was born as a desktop OS [google.com], don't you? :)
byEnderandrew ( 866215 ) writes:
With the Mac OS port, it isn't just the Steam client, but also the Source engine. All the Source-engine games are ported. With a Linux port, expect to see all the Source titles avaiable. Will every Steam game be available in Linux? No, but it would be a new channel for commercial Linux games to be sold.
That is always a step in the right direction.
byRazalhague ( 1497249 ) writes:
And yet Impulse is infinitely better than Steam because you don't need to run Impulse in order to run games you've bought via Impulse.
byTheKidWho ( 705796 ) writes:
Really? You think people don't play games on their Linux based mobile phones?
bysilanea ( 1241518 ) writes:
Do you see Steam and Source based games coming to mobile phones any time soon? He is obviously talking about a different market, namely desktop games.
byDarenN ( 411219 ) writes:
I must disagree - availability of games is a major reason why linux on the desktop hasn't taken off. It's certainly the only reason I have a windows install at all.
At this point, I buy most of my games through Steam, simply because it has the best offerings of all the electronic distribution channels. The only thing missing from it is some kind of family account that lets you share your games with more than one login. Having it manage patching is dead handy, it's a one stop place for all games, and it allow
byTheKidWho ( 705796 ) writes:
No, you're all wrong.
This is an indication of Steam for Android.
byAnonymous Coward writes:
The script shown in the article mentioned linux32 not linux ARM. Whatever it's for, it's not primarily for phones.
bybinarylarry ( 1338699 ) writes:
Valve should partner with Canonical and work with them to get a first class Ubuntu release working.
Canonical could put Steam in their official partner repo for closed source stuff like Adobe's software.
You hear me Gabe, contact Mark Shuttleworth at Ubuntu and lets get this rolling!
byrwa2 ( 4391 ) * writes:
I'm pretty excited about this... there's been a lot of pretty bad news in the past couple years regarding Linux gaming... the current version of UT was promised a Linux port which never arrived, EVE gave up on their crappy Linux port (likely because it actually ran pretty well under wine), and id Software of all people has made menacing threats about future Linux support.
I've started playing a lot of Valve games lately, and now find it hard to go back to some of the other FPSs I've played before. The Steam
byelwin_windleaf ( 643442 ) writes:
Sure, most games won't run natively just yet - only games based on Valve's source engine.
But when I'm on Steam (and I own dozens and dozens of games, put out by several different publishers), 99% of the time I'll be playing a Valve game. I currently have 300+ hours racked up in Team Fortress 2 alone.
If I can format my Windows gaming partition, and only play Valve games on Linux, I'd say it's a sacrifice I'd be willing to make. I suppose Valve will be the only publisher to get my purchases from now on.
byJoe Snipe ( 224958 ) writes:
Are you saying Linux Steam is all vapor?
byonion2k ( 203094 ) writes:
Someone is obviously working on the idea, which is grand, but that's all we can tell at this point. The number of projects that are started and eventually canned because they're either to hard to finish, too costly, or just too expensive to bother marketing that they won't turn a profit is pretty vast.
The fact code exists does not necessarily mean we'll ever get to play the games.
But let's be optimistic. A native version of Steam would be pretty awesome. Here's hoping whoever is behind the project is successful. :)
twitter
facebook
byPharmboy ( 216950 ) writes:
The fact code exists does not necessarily mean we'll ever get to play the games.
Additionally, even if they fully port Source to Linux, most of the games on Steam don't use the Source engine. It would still be A Good Thing® as it would make the platform (Linux/x86) more viable if Steam supported it, which would serve to encourage other companies to release for Linux as well. It will be slow, but it has to start somewhere, and Steam/Valve has a very good reputation for being friendly to both content providers and gamers, providing the least offensive DRM out there.
Parent
twitter
facebook
byjo_ham ( 604554 ) writes:
That's what people said about Mac gaming, and Steam is currently in closed beta - all is not lost.
byRogerborg ( 306625 ) writes:
This could be an ancient script cut-and-pasted to suit. Heck, I've still got a Makefile that has a section for Ultrix but it doesn't mean that it works or that I'm supporting it.
twitter
facebook
byHateBreeder ( 656491 ) writes:
This is not your private development repository we're talking about.
Companies normally don't include "clutter" and left over files in a release tree. Normally, you would have a carefully prepared and checked distribution tree, where every file is accounted for. If steam now includes some linux libraries, I would take it as a very strong indication that they intend to use them.
bylarry bagina ( 561269 ) writes:
steam doesn't include linux libraries, the OS X beta version includes a bash script which checks for darwin/os x and also has a couple lines checking if it's linux.
bythemacks ( 1197889 ) writes:
the interesting bits from the script:
UNAME=`uname`
if [ "$UNAME" == "Darwin" ]; then
PLATFORM=osx32
# prepend our lib path to LD_LIBRARY_PATH
export DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH="${STEAMROOT}"/${PLATFORM}:$DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH
elif [ "$UNAME" == "Linux" ]; then
PLATFORM=linux32
# prepend our lib path to LD_LIBRARY_PATH
export LD_LIBRARY_PATH="${STEAMROOT}"/${PLATFORM}:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH
fi
Parent
twitter
facebook
byLumpy ( 12016 ) writes:
Companies normally don't include "clutter" and left over files in a release tree.
you never looked at files in microsoft releases have you.
byRogerborg ( 306625 ) writes:
This is not your private development repository we're talking about.
Yes, I know, thanks. I wasn't talking about that in the first place. I was talking about my "company release tree". There's a whole bunch of legacy or tried-and-abandoned cruft in there that it's not worth anyone's time to remove. And yes, it goes out to customers, and no, they don't care; they only care if the things that they are paying for work.
If you (and I do mean you personally) are spending time doing that sort of tidying on you
byHateBreeder ( 656491 ) writes:
Sucks to be you.
Almost took you seriously, but then I read that.
bytepples ( 727027 ) writes:
If you (and I do mean you personally) are spending time doing that sort of tidying on your releases, then you're not working on paid tasks, and you are surplus to requirements.
Unless the requirements include 1. that trade secrets about future releases don't leak, and 2. that nothing more offensive than the video submitted to the rating agency ends up on the disc.
bytepples ( 727027 ) writes:
Companies normally don't include "clutter" and left over files in a release tree. Normally, you would have a carefully prepared and checked distribution tree, where every file is accounted for.
Then I guess Hot Coffee, the hidden unfinished sex minigame in one of the Grand Theft Auto games, wasn't "normal".
byChaos Incarnate ( 772793 ) writes:
Because it's far better to leave in some probably-unused sounds/models/textures than to actually remove them only to have the game plotz when you find out that, hey, they were being used for something somewhere.
byicebraining ( 1313345 ) writes:
http://store.steampowered.com/public/client/steam_client_linux?date=706605 [steampowered.com]
bySplab ( 574204 ) writes:
Try rebooting universe.
bygoose-incarnated ( 1145029 ) writes:
Between APPL market cap catching up to MSFT, people moving off to apple products in droves,
google's dominance, and non-MS phones, plus the increasing user-friendlyness of Linux distros,
microsoft hasn't been in the news lately. Now I can *finally* move off of windows totally, if games
on linux take off.
Seems that the "Microsoft is dying" meme might well happen, but not due to a single MS-killer,
but emergence of new monopolies?
bygoose-incarnated ( 1145029 ) writes:
How the hell is that a troll? Damn mods missing meds again
byffreeloader ( 1105115 ) writes:
I don't think MS will ever die, but if they ever lose their grip on the desktop market, it won't have anything to do with linux (I'm typing this on FC-12 so I'm not a hater, just a realist). IMO it'll be increasing Apple market share in laptops (mostly young people) and secondly more and more people simply not caring what OS they are running as more stuff is done through the browser.
This is just anecdotal, but in the small town, but with 2 colleges and 2 universities within 30 miles, where I live I see more
byThunderbird2k ( 1753946 ) writes:
This is no evidence at all. Valve has released dedicated Linux servers for their games for years including steam.
Come on don't take phoroCRAP serious. They make news of nothing.
twitter
facebook
byPhrostyMcByte ( 589271 ) writes:
Indeed -- the Linux binaries in Left 4 Dead were merely for dedicated servers. There was no news there, and the summary makes it seem like Phoronix had greater insight than they really did. Nearly every multiplayer game that runs on Windows has also included dedicated server binaries for Linux, including old Valve titles like Half-Life and Counter-Strike. They just extended that to include a command-line auto-updater that worked through Steam.
That said, if they are porting their games to OS X, it seems l
byAntity-H ( 535635 ) writes:
all they need to worry about is the relatively small windowing, audio, and input code which shouldn't take a seasoned developer more than a week to hack up.
yeah try to tell that to the linux flash maintainer ... http://blogs.adobe.com/penguin.swf/ [adobe.com]
byArchaemic ( 1546639 ) writes:
Or perhaps the lead (only?) programmer for Braid: http://braid-game.com/news/?p=364 [braid-game.com]
(I think there was another post saying "Screw this, it's not coming out for Linux," but that might just be at the end of the comments)
byicebraining ( 1313345 ) writes:
http://store.steampowered.com/public/client/steam_client_linux?date=706605 [steampowered.com]
Sorry for the redundancy.
byepiphani ( 254981 ) writes:
And having gone through large levels of painstaking kernel-level optimization based on best practices provided by both Valve and the community, I can honestly say that their dedicated Linux servers are Crap.
It annoys me too, because the big things that are annoying are things I could fix in half an hour with access to the source.
byVGPowerlord ( 621254 ) writes:
The script mentions both OS X and Linux, and after a quick Google search I couldn't find anything about HLDS on OS X. So I'm going to assume that it's for the Steam client. Unless they're porting HLDS to OS X, which I haven't heard anything about.
Feel free to correct me though.
Valve announced on March 9, 2010 that they were porting all their Source-based games to Mac. Your Mac Questions Answered [teamfortress.com] from the TF2 Blog has more details.
byglenkim ( 412499 ) writes:
As an aspiring game developer, I look at Valve's actions with a lot of excitement lately. Steam and Source are coming to Mac for sure now, and so that means Source SDK should be updated to support deployment to Macs. If Linux is included in this package, it only sweetens the deal. For developers just getting started, Source would have a unique advantage over the other engines available currently (e.g. Unreal, Crytek) in that it would allow developers to reach as wide an audience as possible. I really hope this happens.
twitter
facebook
byV!NCENT ( 1105021 ) writes:
Ever heared about Unigene? It's Win, Lin and Mac and tesselation and OpenGL 4.x and DirectX 11 support.
Commercial, so not FLOSS...
byTypoNAM ( 695420 ) writes:
Unreal tech has been running natively on Mac and Linux as this was done years ago. You don't remember or haven't played Unreal Tournament 2004? Although that was the last Epic games title to run on Linux. UT3 was promised and still hasn't been ported to Linux and released publicly.
Even the original Unreal Tournament was ported to Linux, but by Loki Games and not Epic: http://www.lokigames.com/products/ut/ [lokigames.com]
byHaiyadragon ( 770036 ) writes:
If they do this I will buy a few games the moment they are released. I hate DRM but this kind of development needs to be encouraged. Now if only ATI and/or Nvidia would open up their specs, or some open protocol/source solution would come into existence.
twitter
facebook
bySparr0 ( 451780 ) writes:
I mostly don't buy software or hardware with DRM.
I mostly don't buy software that runs on Windows only.
Steam currently falls into both of those categories, putting it in absolutely-won't-buy land. If it ever comes to Linux, I will probably buy at least a few games through it, but only when they are cheaper than otherwise.
byInner_Child ( 946194 ) writes:
If it ever comes to Linux, I will probably buy at least a few games through it, but only when they are cheaper than otherwise.
It's all about the weekend deals - I picked up the complete X-Com collection (5 full games) a couple months back for the paltry price of $2.
bytepples ( 727027 ) writes:
I mostly don't buy software or hardware with DRM.
DVD players, Blu-ray Disc players, cable boxes, and PC video on demand services all use digital restrictions management. So let me guess: you mostly watch movies only on rabbit ears TV or not at all.
byjaminJay ( 1198469 ) writes:
If it comes to Linux via Steam, I'll have no excuse left.
byNikker ( 749551 ) writes:
Never used steam myself so maybe someone can enlighten me. The video drivers for Linux are crap compared to Windows, does this mean they have some way access the hardware properly? Or does it mean you need twice the hardware to run at the Windows equivalent performance?
twitter
facebook
byAnonymous Coward writes:
On nvidia based hardware I got better performance in some games with Wine then running the same game in Windows. They might be closed source binary blobs, but they do work great.
On the flip side, my laptop (which runs WoW on the lowest settings) refuses to work at all with the binary ATI drivers. And the open source drivers crash X and don't give any real performance that you can use.
byAnonymous Coward writes:
I don't know what world you're living in - FGLRX is buggy and will sometimes decide to start eating my memory like ice cream, but when it works it's not noticeably slower than the Windows drivers. Of course, the newest commercial Linux game I run is ETQW, and I've got a Radeon HD5850, so I may just be covering it up with more hardware.
bylordandmaker ( 960504 ) writes:
I can't tell the difference between HL2 in Windows and in WINE on my system. It does require the non-free drivers, but if I'm playing Steam games I'm not likely to be that bothered.
bymr_da3m0n ( 887821 ) writes:
I can't tell the difference between HL2 in Windows and in WINE on my system. It does require the non-free drivers, but if I'm playing Steam games I'm not likely to be that bothered.
I can, because last time I tried, wine did not provide all the dx9 shaders the engine used. So it certainly looks different to me, as in, slightly better on Windows. But then again it's been a while since I tried it, maybe wine changed significantly since I last did.
byFreonTrip ( 694097 ) writes:
The Nvidia drivers run very well in Linux; in the realm of OpenGL, I've literally found no difference in performance or quality. If anything, the Linux drivers are somewhat better-behaved - setting a 16-bit 3D video mode results in ugly dithering in Windows, but not in Linux.
I have not had occasion to try the fglrx drivers on remotely modern hardware, but last time I tried them it was reminiscent of ATI's driver situation in Windows from a decade earlier: glitchy and somewhat prone to memory leaks, but def
bymr_da3m0n ( 887821 ) writes:
There could still be a chance that the support there is only to launch dedicated servers easily, no? Or am I missing something?
bybucky0 ( 229117 ) writes:
There's already a CLI-based steam client for linux to install dedicated servers though...
byTheNinjaroach ( 878876 ) writes:
I think this is excellent. TF2 already runs pretty great under Wine, I consistently get ~ 60FPS with max resolution and effects.Perhaps if they release a native port I can get closer to the 90FPS I can achieve with Windows.
Not that it really matters much at those rates, but on newer games that will push my hardware to the limits it could be the difference between 20 FPS and 30.
byTruekaiser ( 724672 ) writes:
at the risk of burning karma i will post this.
I moved completely to linux to get away from drm of this kind. i admit steam is a somewhat successful digital distribution system but the drm they bundled with the games makes them too hard to swallow. requiring a constant internet so the games can phone home when needed, sorry offline mode only works a few times before steam refuses to run games until you get back online. along with removing your control of the installed files for the game by putting them in on
byh00manist ( 800926 ) writes:
I moved completely to linux to get away from drm of this kind.
The million-dollar question is, how to get more developers. It takes huge amounts of time to develop all software, games or whatever else, and the time needed grows exponentially with how good you want it to be. How to get programmers so much time, while they still manage to pay their bills. It's understood the software will not be for sale, so...
byRobertLTux ( 260313 ) writes:
sorry offline mode only works a few times before steam refuses to run games until you get back online.
well since it has online stuff as part of the purpose it does want to "check in" with the servers every once in a while
along with removing your control of the installed files for the game by putting them in one big file,
thats completely wrong as about 20 seconds at the steam site will show you
i have also heard rumors that it prevents you from making backups of the install files though
also wr
bymattbee ( 17533 ) writes:
They have a selection of their own games to port, they've moved to a cross-platform front-end - there's no reason they would care to build and test all their games on Linux just to sell to the few thousand geeks. Surely if they're putting effort into Linux, it's because they have a more popular Linux-based platform in mind - maybe their own, maybe Chrome OS, Android... but being the owner of a games platform like that without it being tied to expensive PCs, or to consoles with pricey gatekeepers, would be
byEnderandrew ( 866215 ) writes:
Didn't Valve post job listings two years ago looking for people to port Steam and Source to Mac and Linux? Wasn't that the biggest and most important clue that they intend to do these ports?
The Mac port became official. Should we be surprised there are hints they are working on the Linux port?
bydenmarkw00t ( 892627 ) writes:
Too much wine make a man drunk, but just enough wine makes Steam run on Linux
twitter
facebook
byNarishma ( 822073 ) writes:
You mean the shoddy PS3 ports they didn't do?
byDexy ( 1751176 ) writes:
You mean the shoddy PS3 ports they authorized once, realised how shoddy they were and then never touched again?
Parent
twitter
facebook
byAnonymous Coward writes:
Isnt the "modern graphics hardware" inside the PS3 already outdated? How then can it be modern.
bytepples ( 727027 ) writes:
Isnt the "modern graphics hardware" inside the PS3 already outdated?
Is the PS3's RSX GPU more outdated than the integrated GPU that ships with most PCs?
byarmanox ( 826486 ) writes:
Nothing in the GPL says that a program cannot have use DRM. I'm not sure where you got that idea, or that it would be "trivial to bypass Steam DRM on Linux." Steam itself is the DRM for most Valve games - you have to log into Steam before playing. Secondly, while certain members of the Linux community may be very anti-DRM, Linux is about freedom. That includes the freedom to install closed source software or DRMed software on your system.
byaccount_deleted ( 4530225 ) writes:
Comment removed based on user account deletion
Parent
twitter
facebook
byaccount_deleted ( 4530225 ) writes:
Comment removed based on user account deletion
byrainmouse ( 1784278 ) writes:
Graphics don't make the game, they only colour it in. Games dependant on fantastic graphics tend to age like sour milk and have almost zero replay value.
bytepples ( 727027 ) writes:
Graphics don't make the game, they only colour it in.
Would you rather play Missile Command on an Atari 2600 [youtube.com] or on an Xbox 360 [youtube.com]?
byjedidiah ( 1196 ) writes:
I would rather play the actual arcade version in an emulator.
The Atari 2600 is yet another "adaptation" of the original. It's really no different than an Xbox version.
There's really on substitute for the genuine article.
byCaptain Splendid ( 673276 ) writes:
I would rather play the actual arcade version in an emulator.
WRONG!
The correct answer is you'd rather hit ebay, hunt down an original cabinet, perform the maintenance and repair necessary, and then bask in the awe of both your geek and non-geek friends when they see it sitting in your living room.
Now hand in your geek card.
byVGPowerlord ( 621254 ) writes:
Valve is staffed by people who only know how to work with the shit x86 CPU connected to a big fat expensive graphic card style architecture.
They don't have anyone competent in modern graphics hardware systems like the PS3.
Last time I checked, all of their Source games were available on the Xbox 360, too, which uses a PowerPC architecture.
Having said that, Team Fortress 2 apparently runs into memory issues with the 360 due to its texture resolution... and the number of additional textures added to the PC ver
byfyrewulff ( 702920 ) writes:
No, it's an issue of patch size. You are limited to somewhere around 4MB for a patch on the 360 (it can of course, decompress into something bigger)
byThe Ultimate Fartkno ( 756456 ) writes:
Well, they have to let the hardware cook for a while to see if it's up to the state of the Mozart. Perhaps in the Beethoven.
byCornelius the Great ( 555189 ) writes:
The modern graphic hardware that can't do better than 720p on most games?
Fixed that for you. There are maybe a handful of true 1080p games for the PS3. Hell, the PS3 can't even render full 720p for some games (see: Modern Warfare, GTA IV, etc).
The fact is, that RSX core is equivalent to the Geforce 7000 series GPUs, and the PS3 came out during the same time when the 8800GTX was available. Thus, the PS3 already had obsolete graphics (compared to PCs anyway) even when it was released.
byimakemusic ( 1164993 ) writes:
Valve: Bringing gaming to Linux. (And I don't care how much you think it can't be tolerated, it's still great and wonderful and I will continue to use it.)
Parent
twitter
facebook
byMinwee ( 522556 ) writes:
Or how about "Valve: Bringing a game to Linux"?
byimakemusic ( 1164993 ) writes:
Or "Valve: bringing all of their games to Linux and open up an easy (for developers) route for other games to follow".
Or "Valve: At least they're fucking trying."
bydnaumov ( 453672 ) writes:
Valve: Bringing video game DRM to Linux. (And I don't care about how much you think Steam is great and wonderful, it's still DRM and it cannot be tolerated.)
So I guess you don't do gaming at all then? Considering basically 99% of all major game releases these days have some kind of DRM and considering Steam itself is probably the most lax and non-intrusive kind of DRM there IS. And contrary to the horrors of things like Ubisoft "persistent online connection required even for singleplayer" DRM, Steam actually offers some great value to the user. I don't ever have to worry about losing my physical media or the cdkey stickers becoming unreadable. With several game
bynomadic ( 141991 ) writes:
Considering basically 99% of all major game releases these days have some kind of DRM
99% of major game releases back in the 80's and 90's had DRM too, which everyone seems to forget.
bytepples ( 727027 ) writes:
So I guess you don't do gaming at all then?
That or someone is more interested in board gaming or card gaming than video gaming.
byjo_ham ( 604554 ) writes:
So, don't install it.
There's always nethack.
bySteauengeglase ( 512315 ) writes:
I know it's a compromise, but at least Valve offer something for their DRM: unlimited downloads (well, at least for Valve's games, too bad some of the other publishers aren't as keen to the idea). I hate to say it, but in the game biz there is a certain amount of hate for Linux and Linux nerds. It is viewed as a money pit and its user's are often typified as pirates, this by a business whose hate for piracy can at times pale that of the *AAs. If Valve wants to throw Linux users a bone, I'm all for it.
There may be more comments in this discussion. Without JavaScript enabled, you might want to turn on Classic Discussion System in your preferences instead.
●
286 commentsLinus Torvalds Expresses His Hatred For Case-Insensitive File-Systems
●
277 commentsDenmark Is Dumping Microsoft Office and Windows For LibreOffice and Linux
●
231 commentsWhat the Linux Desktop Really Needs To Challenge Windows
●
197 commentsFour More Tech Bloggers Are Switching to Linux
●
183 commentsLinus Torvalds Rejects RISC-V Changes For Linux 6.17 For Being Late and 'Garbage'
Treasury Goes High-Tech With Redesigned $100 Bills
Red Hat Releases RHEL 6 Public Beta 1
Slashdot Top Deals
Slashdot
●
●
of loaded
●
Submit Story
"Our reruns are better than theirs."
-- Nick at Nite
●FAQ
●Story Archive
●Hall of Fame
●Advertising
●Terms
●Privacy Statement
●About
●Feedback
●Mobile View
●Blog
Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information
Copyright © 2026 Slashdot Media. All Rights Reserved.
×
Close
Working...
Treasury Goes High-Tech With Redesigned $100 Bills
515 comments
Red Hat Releases RHEL 6 Public Beta 1
148 comments
Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information
Copyright © 2026 Slashdot Media. All Rights Reserved.
×
Close
Working...