●Stories
●Firehose
●All
●Popular
●Polls
●Software
●Thought Leadership
Submit
●
Login
●or
●
Sign up
●Topics:
●Devices
●Build
●Entertainment
●Technology
●Open Source
●Science
●YRO
●Follow us:
●RSS
●Facebook
●LinkedIn
●Twitter
●
Youtube
●
Mastodon
●Bluesky
Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop
Forgot your password?
Close
Post
Load All Comments
Full
Abbreviated
Hidden
/Sea
Score:
5
4
3
2
1
0
-1
More
| Reply
Login
Forgot your password?
Close
Close
Log In/Create an Account
●
All
●
Insightful
●
Informative
●
Interesting
●
Funny
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
byTony Isaac ( 1301187 ) writes:
Even Intel, after years of decline, can't keep up.
I'm not a person who denies the usefulness of AI. But there is a ton of garbage ideas out there that will never pan out. But in the short term, all those garbage-AI-idea startups are still needing lots of computers and chips. But a whole lot of them will go out of business, leaving behind perfectly good hardware that can be bought up at fire sale prices. Let the good times roll, because soon, they'll be a distant memory.
byTablizer ( 95088 ) writes:
I forecast Intel will belly up when the AI bubble crash depresses the entire IT industry.
That is unless The Orange One wants the gov't to own even more of Intel: socialism, wooopyy!
However, the backlog of people who want to buy PC's but delay due to high prices may actually give Intel a boost after the crash, as people start buying regular equipment again.
byanoncoward69 ( 6496862 ) writes:
A purchase by Nvidia would probably also create monopoly concerns. Nvidia obviously already makes GPUs, they have in the past made motherboard chipsets for the AMD platform and now if they gobble up Intel's CPU memory and chipset making assets they would pretty much be able to strangle the market into a fully Nvidia only PC. Hell they could just make a single monolitic IC containing CPU, GPU, chipset, memory controller and memory in a single package and be done with it.
byanoncoward69 ( 6496862 ) writes:
I also personally think Nvidia doesn't need Intel besides patents. Based on what they are doing with GPUs you know full well they could probably make a CPU that would make Intel and AMD collectively shit the bed if they really wanted to and wanted to license the IP to be able to,
byTargon ( 17348 ) writes:
You give NVIDIA too much credit. NVIDIA is 75% hype, 25% product advantage. They would try to make another ARM based chip, but that would have to go head to head with Qualcomm in that space, and Exynos isn't bad, just isn't quite as good.
Reply to This Parent
twitter
facebook
Flag as Inappropriate
There may be more comments in this discussion. Without JavaScript enabled, you might want to turn on Classic Discussion System in your preferences instead.
Slashdot
●
●
Submit Story
If A = B and B = C, then A = C, except where void or prohibited by law.
-- Roy Santoro
●FAQ
●Story Archive
●Hall of Fame
●Advertising
●Terms
●Privacy Statement
●About
●Feedback
●Mobile View
●Blog
Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information
Copyright © 2026 Slashdot Media. All Rights Reserved.
×
Close
Working...
Working...