EFF and ACLU of Northern California to ISPs and Content Owners: Do Your Part to Protect Political Speech

DEEPLINKS BLOG ByCorynne McSherry August 25, 2008

EFF and ACLU of Northern California to ISPs and Content Owners: Do Your Part to Protect Political Speech

Share It Coauthored by ACLU of Northern California Technology and Civil Liberties Policy Director Nicole A. Ozer

On blogs, personal and political websites, and through user generated content sites, ordinary citizens in extraordinary numbers are recreating a public sphere and reinvigorating the democratic debate at the core of our political system. 46% of Americans have already used the Internet in connection with the political campaign- more than during all of 2004.1 User-generated content is playing a particularly integral role, with 35% of Americans watching online videos and 10% using social networking sites to engage in political activity. 2 An overwhelming number of political discussions are taking place in publicly-accessible but privately-owned, online town squares. Which means that this important political speech depends on service providers, users, and content owners all doing their part to safeguard free speech. Unfortunately, political speech has been threatened repeatedly by claims that controversial material violates a site’s terms of use or infringes copyrights or trademark rights. Here are just a few recent examples: ●The International Olympics Committee demanded that YouTube remove a video of a protest by Students For A Free Tibet, based on a bogus copyright infringement claim. The IOC subsequently withdrew the notice, but the IOC’s demand is a lesson in the dangers of hair-trigger DMCA takedowns by service providers. ●An alleged terms of service violation caused YouTube to take down a slideshow of a military funeral. ●Another alleged terms of use violation caused YouTube to remove a video critical of John McCain, apparently because the video included numerous graphic images of the effects of war. But those images were integral to the commentary: the video focused on McCain’s support for the Iraq war. ●An apparent copyright complaint caused Broadview Networks to shut down a political website parodying Exxon’s environmental policies. ●The Republican National Committee threatened the online vendor CafePress for allowing users to create t-shirts using Republican trademarks, like "Grand Old Party," or the official version of the elephant logo. ●The Chicago Auto Show tried to use allegations of trademark infringement to force the shutdown of a satirical website promoting transportation alternatives. ●The Associated Press tried to use the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) to force the takedown of blog entries that reproduced excerpts of AP news stories—some of them just a few words long. ACLU of Northern California and EFF urge service providers to take extra precautions before pulling the plug on political speech. Remember that you're facilitating a new era of reason and debate, and that there are laws that protect you as a facilitator. By taking that responsibility seriously, you’ll do right by your users, content owners and the political process. We urge content owners to count to ten and look at the Fair Use Frequently Asked Questions and Fair Use Principles for User-Generated Video Content for some guidance before firing off a complaint. Remember that you are legally obligated to consider whether the use of your material is a fair use. Consider carefully whether actions may result in the loss of free speech, and remember: the antidote to free speech that you don't like is MORE free speech. Make your voice heard with a written blog post, a video blog post, or a message in the comment thread. We also urge users to contact us if they feel that their political speech has been improperly censored. As we move forward into the fall election season, the Internet can continue to revitalize our political lives in exciting and unforeseen ways—but only if service providers, users and content owners all do their parts. No matter where you stand on the candidates or the issues, we should all agree on one principle: No downtime for online free speech! ●1. http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_2008_election.pdf ●2. Id. As many as 65-milliion Americans watched the virally distributed, political web video, “This Land,” in 2004. Under the Radar and Over the Top: Online Political Videos in the 2004 Election. http://www.ipdi.org/UploadedFiles/web_videos.pdf

Related Issues

Free Speech No Downtime for Free Speech

Related Updates

Deeplinks Blog byCindy Cohn | January 26, 2026

EFF Statement on ICE and CBP Violence

In the past year, ICE and CBP have descended into utter lawlessness, repeatedly refusing to exercise or submit to the democratic accountability required by the Constitution and our system of laws. These violations must stop now.

Deeplinks Blog byPaige Collings | January 20, 2026

EFF Joins Internet Advocates Calling on the Iranian Government to Restore Full Internet Connectivity

EFF has joined architects, operators, and stewards of the global internet infrastructure in calling upon authorities in Iran to immediately restore full and unfiltered internet access. We further call upon the international technical community to remain vigilant in monitoring connectivity and to support efforts that ensure the internet remains open...

hands holding a phone showing a heavily censored news article

Deeplinks Blog byJoe Mullin | January 16, 2026

EFF Condemns FBI Search of Washington Post Reporter’s Home

Government invasion of a reporter’s home, and seizure of journalistic materials, is exactly the kind of abuse of power the First Amendment is designed to prevent. It represents the most extreme form of press intimidation. Yet, that’s what happened on Wednesday morning to Washington Post reporter Hannah Natanson, when ...

A blue hand holding a cellphone showing a verification screen and ACCESS DENIED in the background

Deeplinks Blog byJoe Mullin | January 16, 2026

Congress Wants To Hand Your Parenting to Big Tech

Instead of respecting how most parents guide their kids towards healthy and educational content, KOSMA hands the control panel to Big Tech. That’s right—this bill would take power away from parents, and hand it over to the companies that lawmakers say are the problem.

Bullhorn with "2025 Year in Review" coming out of it in bold letters

Deeplinks Blog byRindala Alajaji | January 1, 2026

The Year States Chose Surveillance Over Safety: 2025 in Review

2025 was the year age verification went from a fringe policy experiment to a sweeping reality across the United States. Half of the U.S. now mandates age verification for accessing adult content or social media platforms. Nine states saw their laws take effect this year alone,...

Deeplinks Blog byAaron Mackey | December 31, 2025

States Tried to Censor Kids Online. Courts, and EFF, Mostly Stopped Them: 2025 in Review

Lawmakers in at least a dozen states believe that they can pass laws blocking young people from social media or require them to get their parents’ permission before logging on. Fortunately, nearly every trial court to review these laws has ruled that they are unconstitutional.It’s not just courts telling these...

Deeplinks Blog byHudson Hongo | December 28, 2025

EFFector Audio Speaks Up for Our Rights: 2025 Year in Review

EFFector's audio companion features exclusive interviews where EFF's lawyers, activists, and technologists dig deeper into the biggest stories in privacy, free speech, and innovation. Here are some of the best interviews from EFFector Audio in 2025.

Deeplinks Blog byIndia McKinney, Aaron Mackey | December 27, 2025

Lawmakers Must Listen to Young People Before Regulating Their Internet Access: 2025 in Review

State and federal lawmakers have introduced multiple proposals in 2025 to curtail or outright block children and teenagers from accessing legal content on the internet. On top of violating minors’ First Amendment rights, these laws also actively harm minors who rely on the internet to find community and support, and...

Deeplinks Blog byPaige Collings, Alexis Hancock, Christoph Schmon | December 25, 2025

Age Verification Threats Across the Globe: 2025 in Review

Age verification mandates won't magically keep young people safer online, but that has not stopped governments around the world spending 2025 implementing or attempting to introduce legislation requiring all online users to verify their ages before accessing the digital space.

Deeplinks Blog byIndia McKinney, Joe Mullin | December 24, 2025

Politicians Rushed Through An Online Speech “Solution.” Victims Deserve Better.

Earlier this year, both chambers of Congress passed the TAKE IT DOWN Act. This bill, while well-intentioned, gives powerful people a new legal tool to force online platforms to remove lawful speech that they simply don't like. The bill, sponsored by Senate Commerce Chair Ted Cruz (R-TX) and Rep....