McCain Campaign Feels DMCA Sting

DEEPLINKS BLOG By Fred von Lohmann October 14, 2008

McCain Campaign Feels DMCA Sting

Share It Yesterday, the McCain-Palin campaign sent a letter to YouTube describing the troubles it has been having with bogus DMCA takedowns targeting its videos: [O]verreaching copyright claims have resulted in the removal of non-infringing campaign videos from YouTube, thus silencing political speech. Numerous times during the course of the campaign, our advertisements or web videos have been the subject of DMCA takedown notices regarding uses that are clearly privileged under the fair use doctrine. The uses at issue have been the inclusion of fewer than ten seconds of footage from news broadcasts in campaign ads or videos, as a basis for commentary on the issues presented in the news reports, or on the reports themselves. These are paradigmatic examples of fair use... It's heartening to see a presidential campaign recognize the importance of fair use and "remix culture" (the Obama-Biden campaign has also been the victim of frivolous takedowns from big media companies, so this is a bipartisan problem). EFF, the ACLU, Harvard's Citizen's Media Law Project, and Stanford's Fair Use Project have been making the same point for several years now. EFF has also been providing direct legal assistance to victims of DMCA abuse. Unfortunately, the solution proposed by the McCain campaign addresses only the tip of the iceberg: [W]e believe that it would consume few resources--and provide enormous benefit--for YouTube to commit to a full legal review of all takedown notices on videos posted from accounts controlled by (at least) political candidates and campaigns. The obvious problem with this solution? It assumes that YouTube should prioritize the campaigns' fair use rights, rather than those of the rest of us. That seems precisely backwards, since the most exciting new possibilities on YouTube are for amateur political expression by the voters themselves. After all, the campaigns have no trouble getting the same ads out on television and radio, options not available to most YouTubers. Let's start by identifying the real villains here: the major news media outlets. They are the ones censoring these political ads, based on the use of a few seconds of their footage. The networks need to back off and give fair use a wide berth. So let's start by shaming the bad guys here. In addition, lawsuits might help. Under the DMCA, both the campaigns themselves and YouTube have standing to sue those who send clearly bogus takedown notices. (EFF has represented video creators in a number of these cases, including against Viacom.) There are other possible solutions, as well. Stay tuned for our specific ideas on what YouTube can do to protect fair use while staying within the bounds of its DMCA safe harbor protection (hint: as the McCain-Palin letter points out, you don't need a safe harbor if the video isn't infringing, something that human review by YouTube should be able to determine). UPDATE: The McCain-Palin campaign has identified the news outlets behind the YouTube removals: CBS, Fox News, and the Christian Broadcasting Network. We noted above that NBC has targeted an Obama-Biden video for removal. That's four news entities that should know better.

Related Issues

DMCA Free Speech Fair Use Digital Video

Related Updates

Deeplinks Blog byCory Doctorow | October 3, 2025

What Europe’s New Gig Work Law Means for Unions and Technology

At EFF, we believe that tech rights are worker’s rights. Since the pandemic, workers of all kinds have been subjected to increasingly invasive forms of bossware. These are the “algorithmic management” tools that surveil workers on and off the job, often running on devices that (nominally) belong...

Deeplinks Blog byCorynne McSherry, Tori Noble | July 18, 2025

EFF to Court: The DMCA Didn't Create a New Right of Attribution, You Shouldn't Either

Amid a wave of lawsuits targeting how AI companies use copyrighted works to train large language models that generate new works, a peculiar provision of copyright law is suddenly in the spotlight: Section 1202 of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA). Section 1202 restricts intentionally removing or changing copyright management...

Deeplinks Blog byCory Doctorow | June 18, 2025

Apple to Australians: You’re Too Stupid to Choose Your Own Apps

Apple has released a scaremongering, self-serving warning aimed at the Australian government, claiming that Australians will be overrun by a parade of digital horribles if Australia follows the European Union’s lead and regulates Apple’s “walled garden.” The EU’s Digital Markets Act is a big, complex, ambitious law that...

EFF Presents "Fix Copyright", a design featuring a cartoon mouse hacking his tractor.

Deeplinks Blog byKatharine Trendacosta | January 27, 2025

It's Copyright Week 2025: Join Us in the Fight for Better Copyright Law and Policy

Copyright is no longer—if it ever was—a niche concern of certain industries. As corporations have pushed to expand copyright, they have made it everyone’s problem. And that means they don’t get to make the law in secret anymore.

Deeplinks Blog byTori Noble | January 23, 2025

Second Circuit Rejects Record Labels’ Attempt to Rewrite the DMCA

In a major win for creator communities, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has once again handed video streaming site Vimeo a solid win in its long-running legal battle with Capitol Records and a host of other record labels.The labels claimed that Vimeo was liable...

Deeplinks Blog byBetty Gedlu, Mitch Stoltz | December 12, 2024

EFF Speaks Out in Court for Citizen Journalists

No one gets to abuse copyright to shut down debate. Because of that, we at EFF represent Channel 781, a group of citizen journalists whose YouTube channel was temporarily shut down following copyright infringement claims made by Waltham Community Access Corporation (WCAC). As part of that case, the federal court...

Deeplinks Blog byCorynne McSherry | August 19, 2024

NO FAKES – A Dream for Lawyers, a Nightmare for Everyone Else

Performers and ordinary humans are increasingly concerned that they may be replaced or defamed by AI-generated imitations. We’re seeing a host of bills designed to address that concern – but every one just generates new problems. Case in point: the NO FAKES Act. We flagged numerous flaws in a “discussion...

Deeplinks Blog byKit Walsh | August 2, 2024

Federal Appeals Court Rules That Fair Use May Be Narrowed to Serve Hollywood Profits

Section 1201 of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act is a ban on reading any copyrighted work that is encumbered by access restrictions. It makes it illegal for you to read and understand the code that determines how your phone or car works and whether those devices are safe. It makes...

Takedown Hall of Shame banner image: warning sign in the style of glitchy video

Press Release | July 24, 2024

Journalists Sue Massachusetts TV Corporation Over Bogus YouTube Takedown Demands

BOSTON—A citizen journalists’ group represented by the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) filed a federal lawsuit today against a Massachusetts community-access television company for falsely convincing YouTube to take down video clips of city government meetings. The lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for Massachusetts...

Deeplinks Blog byAaron Jue | June 18, 2024

Ah, Steamboat Willie. It’s been too long. 🐭

Did you know Disney’s Steamboat Willie entered the public domain this year? Since its 1928 debut, U.S. Congress has made multiple changes to copyright law, extending Disney’s ownership of this cultural icon for almost a century. A century.Creativity should spark more creativity.That’s not how intellectual property laws are...