Skip to main content ●About ●Contact ●Press ●People ●Opportunities ●EFF's 35th Anniversary ●Issues ●Free Speech ●Privacy ●Creativity and Innovation ●Transparency ●International ●Security ●Our Work ●Deeplinks Blog ●Press Releases ●Events ●Legal Cases ●Whitepapers ●Podcast ●Annual Reports ●Take Action ●Action Center ●Electronic Frontier Alliance ●Volunteer ●Tools ●Privacy Badger ●Surveillance Self-Defense ●Certbot ●Atlas of Surveillance ●Cover Your Tracks ●Street Level Surveillance ●apkeep ●Donate ●Donate to EFF ●Giving Societies ●Shop ●Sponsorships ●Other Ways to Give ●Membership FAQ ●Donate ●Donate to EFF ●Shop ●Other Ways to Give

Email updates on news, actions, and events in your area. Join EFF Lists ●Copyright (CC BY) ●Trademark ●Privacy Policy ●Thanks Electronic Frontier Foundation Donate Electronic Frontier Foundation ●About ●Contact ●Press ●People ●Opportunities ●EFF's 35th Anniversary ●Issues ●Free Speech ●Privacy ●Creativity and Innovation ●Transparency ●International ●Security ●Our Work ●Deeplinks Blog ●Press Releases ●Events ●Legal Cases ●Whitepapers ●Podcast ●Annual Reports ●Take Action ●Action Center ●Electronic Frontier Alliance ●Volunteer ●Tools ●Privacy Badger ●Surveillance Self-Defense ●Certbot ●Atlas of Surveillance ●Cover Your Tracks ●Street Level Surveillance ●apkeep ●Donate ●Donate to EFF ●Giving Societies ●Shop ●Sponsorships ●Other Ways to Give ●Membership FAQ ●Donate ●Donate to EFF ●Shop ●Other Ways to Give

National Security Letters

●FAQ ●Timeline

National Security Letters

Since the first national security letter (NSL) statute was passed in 1986 and then dramatically expanded under the USA PATRIOT Act, the FBI has issued hundreds of thousands of such letters seeking the private telecommunications and financial records of Americans without any prior approval from courts. In addition to this immense investigatory power, NSL statutes also permit the FBI to unilaterally gag recipients and prevent them from criticizing such actions publicly. This combination of powers — to investigate and to silence — has coalesced to permit the FBI to wield enormous power and to operate without meaningful checks, far from the watchful eyes of the judicial branch. Not surprisingly, this lack of checks has contributed to a dramatic expansion in the use of these tools across the country. Indeed, for the period between 2003 and 2006 alone, almost 200,000 requests for private customer information were sought pursuant to various NSL statutes. EFF has fought for years to spread awareness of National Security Letters and add accountability and oversight to the process. Beginning in 2011, we brought a set of major constitutional challenges to the NSL statute on behalf of the NSL recipients CREDO and Cloudflare, who were forced to litigate in secret for almost six years. In 2013, we won a landmark victory in the Northern District of California in which Judge Susan Illston declared one of the statutes unconstitutional in one of CREDO's cases. In response, Congress amended the NSL statute as part of the USA FREEDOM Act in June 2015. In July 2017, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued an opinion upholding the amended NSL statute against these providers' challenges. EFF continues to push for NSL reform, including by asking companies to require judicial review of all NSLs. We are also pursuing a FOIA lawsuit for more information about the NSL "Termination Procedures" adopted pursuant to USA Freedom.. This builds on over a decade of FOIA work and other advocacy regarding NSLs. For example, in 2007 EFF filed Freedom of Information Act litigation seeking documentation of National Security Letter misuse by the FBI. Thousands of pages of documents were released over a period of four years leading to repeated revealationsofgovernment abuses of power. An EFF report based on these documents led to tough questions for the FBI before Congress. The documents also helped prompt the Senate Judiciary Committee to investigate whether Attorney General Alberto Gonzales lied to Congress. And in 2008 and again in 2016, EFF successfully defended the Internet Archive from inappropriate National Security Letters.

Protect digital privacy and free expression. EFF's public interest legal work, activism, and software development preserve fundamental rights. Protect digital privacy and free expression. EFF's public interest legal work, activism, and software development preserve fundamental rights. DONATE TO EFF

EFF Related Content: National Security Letters

Press Release | November 1, 2023

EFF to Supreme Court: Reverse Dangerous Prior Restraint Ruling Upholding FBI Gag on X’s Surveillance Transparency Report

WASHINGTON, D.C.—The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) urged the Supreme Court today to review and reverse a dangerous ruling allowing the Justice Department to censor X’s ability to publish information about government requests for the platform’s private user data, a decision that undermines at least a hundred years of... ●Read more about EFF to Supreme Court: Reverse Dangerous Prior Restraint Ruling Upholding FBI Gag on X’s Surveillance Transparency Report

Document | November 1, 2023

EFF Brief Twitter vs Garland

●Read more about EFF Brief Twitter vs Garland

Deeplinks Blog byAndrew Crocker | March 10, 2023

Appeals Court Upholds Restriction on Twitter’s First Amendment Right to Publish National Security Transparency Report

●Español A ruling from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals earlier this week marks a new low in judicial deference to classification and national security, even against the nearly inviolable First Amendment right to be free of prior restraints against speech. In Twitter v. Garland, the court ruled that it... ●Read more about Appeals Court Upholds Restriction on Twitter’s First Amendment Right to Publish National Security Transparency Report

Document | September 30, 2020

Twitter v. Barr: amicus brief of EFF & ACLU

Deeplinks Blog by Naomi Gilens | October 9, 2020

EFF and ACLU Ask Ninth Circuit to Overturn Government’s Censorship of Twitter’s Transparency Report

Citing national security concerns, the government is attempting to infringe on Twitter's First Amendment right to inform the public about secret government surveillance orders. For more than six years, Twitter has been fighting in court to share information about law enforcement orders it received in 2014. Now, Twitter has brought... ●Read more about EFF and ACLU Ask Ninth Circuit to Overturn Government’s Censorship of Twitter’s Transparency Report

Pages

●1 ●2 ●3 ●4 ●5 ●6 ●7 ●8 ●9 ●… ●next ﹀ ●last » Back to top

Follow EFF:

●mastodon ●facebook ●instagram ●x ●Blue Sky ●youtube ●flicker ●linkedin ●tiktok ●threads Check out our 4-star rating on Charity Navigator.

Contact

●General ●Legal ●Security ●Membership ●Press

About

●Calendar ●Volunteer ●Victories ●History ●Internships ●Jobs ●Staff ●Diversity & Inclusion

Issues

●Free Speech ●Privacy ●Creativity & Innovation ●Transparency ●International ●Security

Updates

●Blog ●Press Releases ●Events ●Legal Cases ●Whitepapers ●EFFector Newsletter

Press

●Press Contact

Donate

●Join or Renew Membership Online ●One-Time Donation Online ●Giving Societies ●Corporate Giving and Sponsorship ●Shop ●Other Ways to Give ●Copyright (CC BY) ●Trademark ●Privacy Policy ●Thanks