This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Croatia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Croatia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CroatiaWikipedia:WikiProject CroatiaTemplate:WikiProject CroatiaCroatia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Why is the type of crash in the infobox describes as "Conspiracy CFIT" ... what is the meaning of ""Conspiracy"?
What time of day was the crash - seems important information to me. Ditto weather, or, at least, visibility. I'm failing to unerstand why the pilots were unable to see the airstrip. --Tagishsimon(talk) 12:57, 3 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
There is controversy regarding the official explanation behind this crash. The focus is primarily on the supposed gun shot wound observed in Ron Browns head. I believe a controversy section added to this article would be in good taste. --Northroad (talk) 04:37, 12 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I'm wondering, why does Ashley Davis redirect here? I read the article but it didn't mention any person by that name neither explain anything about it. —Dipnlik (talk) 03:23, 20 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
FYI this has been fixed in the article so you don't need to check for it like I just did. the old one is cached at waybackmachine and the new one is at defense.gov, article by Linda D. Kozaryn 108.182.13.221 (talk) 19:26, 25 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Here in the UK, I've just watched this episode of Air Crash Investigation.
Why doesn't the article mention that the airport at Dubrovnik was not approved, by the U.S. DoD, for use by U.S. military transport aircraft?
The TV programme also seems to suggest that the aircraft was not properly equipped for its use as a VIP transport and that charts issued to the crew were not up-to-date and had not been reviewed, as required, on the instructions of the operations commander of the 86th Airlift Wing.
Surely these items are pertinent and should be included in the article?
Agent0060 22:03, 25 June 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Agent0060 (talk • contribs)
Would this also be a possible "Boeing 737 rudder issues" wiki, the time of the accident is during the time the 737s were having fatal rudder issues, from 1991 to 2001. The FAA ordered an upgrade of all Boeing 737 rudder control systems by November 12, 2002 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.8.114.103 (talk) 01:57, 20 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 12 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
I added a map to the article and placed the coordinates shown for the crash site and Čilipi airport, but the points come up in the ocean. Any help?
Also, I tried to map the map all the former Yugoslav countries to include Tuzla, but when I previews it, the points had moved drastically despite that I had not changed them.
Please help!
Thank you, Jacsam2 (talk) 16:59, 22 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
Corrected the locations on the map, but I'm not 100% sure about the crash location. Zeljko — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.139.108.181 (talk) 16:48, 26 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
Thank you very much for your help! I also attempted to have the map show Tuzla in Bosnia in yellowish as well so I added Yugoslavia (modern nations) map to the page but again in the preview the locations were not correct! Do you know how to fix this? Thank you! Jacsam2 (talk) 22:39, 26 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
Before I change this, is there something strange about the foreign language report?
Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The paragraph says TSgt Shelly Kelly died of "an injury sustained in an ambulance" rather than
"died from her injuries in an ambulance enroute to the hospital." Is this a translation error? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.73.22.113 (talk) 21:49, 27 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 2 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Procedural close - nominator blocked as a sock. (non-admin closure) BilCat (talk) 22:54, 9 February 2022 (UTC) BilCat (talk) 22:54, 9 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.