 | Henry Ward Beecher has been listed as one of the Philosophy and religion good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: June 11, 2013. (Reviewed version). |
 | This  level-5 vital article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I don't know how to properly cite a Sherlock Holmes book (The Resident Patient), but should it be mentioned in the Popular Culture section? I've quoted the relevant passage below, and the portrait of Beecher can be seen in the TV show Sherlock, episode: "The Abominable Bride" (2016).
Do you mean to say that you read my train of thoughts from my features?” “Your features, and especially your eyes. Perhaps you cannot yourself recall how your reverie commenced?” “No, I cannot.” “Then I will tell you. After throwing down your paper, which was the action which drew my attention to you, you sat for half a minute with a vacant expression. Then your eyes fixed themselves upon your newly framed picture of General Gordon, and I saw by the alteration in your face that a train of thought had been started. But it did not lead very far. Your eyes turned across to the unframed portrait of Henry Ward Beecher, which stands upon the top of your books. You then glanced up at the wall, and of course your meaning was obvious. You were thinking that if the portrait were framed it would just cover that bare space and correspond with Gordon’s picture over there.” “You have followed me wonderfully!” I exclaimed. “So far I could hardly have gone astray. But now your thoughts went back to Beecher, and you looked hard across as if you were studying the character in his features. Then your eyes ceased to pucker, but you continued to look across, and your face was thoughtful. You were recalling the incidents of Beecher’s career. I was well aware that you could not do this without thinking of the mission which he undertook on behalf of the North at the time of the Civil War, for I remember you expressing your passionate indignation at the way in which he was received by the more turbulent of our people. You felt so strongly about it that I knew you could not think of Beecher without thinking of that also. When a moment later I saw your eyes wander away from the picture, I suspected that your mind had now turned to the Civil War, and when I observed that your lips set, your eyes sparkled, and your hands clinched, I was positive that you were indeed thinking of the gallantry which was shown by both sides in that desperate struggle. But then, again, your face grew sadder; you shook your head. You were dwelling upon the sadness and horror and useless waste of life. Your hand stole towards your own old wound, and a smile quivered on your lips, which showed me that the ridiculous side of this method of settling international questions had forced itself upon your mind. At this point I agreed with you that it was preposterous, and was glad to find that all my deductions had been correct.”
An author writes, "He was also rabidly anti-Catholic and was contemptuous towards Irish-Americans." "Rabidly" is a charged word, an attack word, and "contemptuous" leaves the reader hanging. What, was Beecher simply opposed to the mass immigration then coming from Ireland, or was he truly discriminatory? Encyclopedic content must be verifiable. Whoever penned this sentence is contemptuous of Beecher, as such language is not fitting for an encyclopedia entry. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.69.139.11 (talk • contribs) 03:44, 17 September 2006
I added the tag because the article has very poor flow due to the strings of quotes used instead of prose. It's interesting to read what others have said about Mr Beecher in their own words - and it may be useful to retain their actual words in some cases - but an encyclopedia article has to live or die on its own, hopefully scintillating, prose. Anchoress 03:59, 5 November 2006 (UTC)Reply
I added a Beecher quote in the Preaching Style section, but it's misnumbered. I don't know how to fix it, could anyone else do it? Thanks! The Sanity Inspector 14:48, 18 September 2007 (UTC)Reply
The first sentence in this article labels Beecher as a "theologically liberal American Congregationalist clergyman." There is no citation proving this and no description of his "theologically liberal" views. It's just thrown out there at the beginning and forgotten. There is one line saying that he believed in Darwin's Theory of Evolution, but that hardly qualifies someone as "theologically liberal." Is there an assumption that being socially active makes one Theologically Liberal? Could a link be added to a page that defines Christian Liberal Theology?
How many children were born to Beecher & wife? The number changes from 10 to nine within the article! Kkid99 (talk) 17:35, 21 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
ERm, also it currently says that he was the seventh of 13 siblings, but his mother died when he was three. This might just about be barely possible if she had at least two pairs of twins and was continuously pregnant, but it seems unlikely.... surely this is wrong.., —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.183.140.34 (talk) 00:36, 12 February 2010 (UTC)Reply
I deleted what appeared to be editorial comments in one section of the main text and a bit of vandalism in the legacy —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.145.177.11 (talk) 14:38, 22 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
Shouldn't this kind of thing be moved to WikiQuote? 67.188.174.165 (talk) 21:13, 12 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
Question.....how could his last words be "now comes the mystery" when he had a stroke and died in his sleep??? 98.193.183.203 (talk) 21:36, 3 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
Hey all, over the coming week I'm hoping to expand and revise this article to prepare for a nomination for Good Article status. I'm preparing a new draft in my user space at User:Khazar2/Beecher and would welcome any comments or additions anyone would like to make there.
Things I'd like to work on:
Anybody have anything else to add to the list?
Incidentally, I may try to tackle the Lyman Beecher article after this as well. -- Khazar2 (talk) 03:35, 18 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
| GA toolbox |
|---|
|
|
| Reviewing |
|
|
Reviewer: Tim riley (talk · contribs) 09:22, 11 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
Beginning first read through. More soonest. Tim riley (talk) 09:22, 11 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
This article is clearly of GA standard, and I don't propose to prolong the review. But before I observe the formalities I offer a few small points that you are welcome to accept or reject, as you think best.
Those few insignificant points are all I can find to quibble about. If you are thinking of taking the article on to FAC I think you need to get at least one more major biographical source: at present you rely very heavily on Applegate. Fine for GA, but FA reviewers will expect a wider range of sources.
Now, to cut the ribbon:
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
I enjoyed this article. Beecher is one of those names one vaguely knows without quite knowing why. And now I do. Out of interest I looked out his obituary in our leading British paper, The Times, which said of him, "one of the ablest and most popular of United States citizens – a man in whom were embodied many of the virtues and some of the failings of the national character", which chimes pretty well with your Applegate peroration at ref 64. I enjoyed spending a few hours in Beecher's company courtesy of this fine article. – Tim riley (talk) 12:41, 11 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Henry Ward Beecher. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:07, 1 April 2017 (UTC)Reply
library of Congress has an illustration we can use in the article. Lightburst (talk) 19:20, 4 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
